PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRNT vs. KRP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GRNT vs. KRP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Granite Ridge Resources Inc (GRNT) and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRNT achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than KRP's 31.73% return.


GRNT

1D
-3.84%
1M
-16.44%
YTD
0.31%
6M
-0.75%
1Y
-23.37%
3Y*
-5.99%
5Y*
-9.42%
10Y*

KRP

1D
-0.47%
1M
-3.23%
YTD
31.73%
6M
34.47%
1Y
11.75%
3Y*
11.77%
5Y*
14.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRNT vs. KRP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GRNT
Granite Ridge Resources Inc
0.31%-21.29%14.92%-28.45%-7.12%-2.06%1.09%
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP
31.73%-18.60%20.43%0.76%36.93%89.97%32.72%

Correlation

The correlation between GRNT and KRP is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2020

0.30

Over the past year, GRNT and KRP have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GRNT:

$589.10M

KRP:

$1.75B

EPS

GRNT:

-$0.25

KRP:

$0.60

PS Ratio

GRNT:

1.80

KRP:

5.69

PB Ratio

GRNT:

1.08

KRP:

3.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

GRNT:

$327.38M

KRP:

$309.11M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GRNT:

$64.03M

KRP:

$319.28M

EBITDA (TTM)

GRNT:

$255.54M

KRP:

$177.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRNT vs. KRP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRNT
GRNT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
GRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

KRP
KRP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
KRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRP Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
KRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRP Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRNT vs. KRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Ridge Resources Inc (GRNT) and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRNTKRPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.10

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

0.58

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

1.49

-2.72

GRNT vs. KRP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRNT Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the KRP Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRNT and KRP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRNT vs. KRP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRNT drawdown since its inception was -50.26%, smaller than the maximum KRP drawdown of -80.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNT and KRP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRNTKRPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.26%

-80.91%

+30.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.14%

-20.50%

-13.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.11%

-27.58%

-9.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.87%

-27.58%

-22.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.59%

-5.41%

-37.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.92%

-19.36%

-3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.04%

7.97%

+11.07%

Volatility

GRNT vs. KRP - Volatility Comparison

Granite Ridge Resources Inc (GRNT) has a higher volatility of 12.03% compared to Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) at 6.53%. This indicates that GRNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRNTKRPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.03%

6.53%

+5.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.62%

16.82%

+15.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.82%

23.03%

+18.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.35%

28.35%

+12.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.21%

41.28%

-3.07%

Dividends

GRNT vs. KRP - Dividend Comparison

GRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.76%, less than KRP's 10.27% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRNT
Granite Ridge Resources Inc
9.76%9.36%6.81%7.31%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP
10.27%13.61%10.78%11.50%11.26%8.36%11.00%9.29%12.22%5.17%

Financials

GRNT vs. KRP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Granite Ridge Resources Inc and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M202220232024202520260
65.54M
(GRNT) Total Revenue
(KRP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GRNT and KRP have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRNT has higher volatility (12.03%) compared to KRP (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRNT dropped -50.26% vs KRP's -80.91%.

KRP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRNT and KRP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer