PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRNT vs. GPRK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GRNT vs. GPRK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Granite Ridge Resources Inc (GRNT) and GeoPark Limited (GPRK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRNT achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly lower than GPRK's 51.90% return.


GRNT

1D
-0.40%
1M
-15.78%
YTD
10.99%
6M
-1.76%
1Y
-5.98%
3Y*
1.72%
5Y*
-7.70%
10Y*

GPRK

1D
-5.01%
1M
15.27%
YTD
51.90%
6M
35.78%
1Y
61.60%
3Y*
10.00%
5Y*
-2.50%
10Y*
19.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRNT vs. GPRK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GRNT
Granite Ridge Resources Inc
10.99%-21.29%14.92%-28.45%-7.12%-2.06%0.83%
GPRK
GeoPark Limited
51.90%-14.55%15.15%-41.47%38.97%-10.99%94.59%

Correlation

The correlation between GRNT and GPRK is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020

0.28

The correlation between GRNT and GPRK shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GRNT:

$651.79M

GPRK:

$622.18M

EPS

GRNT:

-$0.25

GPRK:

$1.07

PS Ratio

GRNT:

1.99

GPRK:

1.23

PB Ratio

GRNT:

1.19

GPRK:

2.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

GRNT:

$327.38M

GPRK:

$483.58M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GRNT:

$64.03M

GPRK:

$219.13M

EBITDA (TTM)

GRNT:

$255.54M

GPRK:

$200.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRNT vs. GPRK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRNT
GRNT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
GRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

GPRK
GPRK Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GPRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPRK Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GPRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPRK Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRNT vs. GPRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Ridge Resources Inc (GRNT) and GeoPark Limited (GPRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRNTGPRKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.22

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

2.91

-3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.32

5.79

-6.11

GRNT vs. GPRK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRNT Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the GPRK Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRNT and GPRK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRNTGPRKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

1.11

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

-0.05

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

0.04

-0.23

Drawdowns

GRNT vs. GPRK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRNT drawdown since its inception was -50.26%, smaller than the maximum GPRK drawdown of -84.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNT and GPRK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRNTGPRKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.26%

-84.04%

+33.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.14%

-21.26%

-12.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.11%

-47.81%

+10.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.87%

-61.67%

+11.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.48%

-35.68%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.80%

-42.24%

+19.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.45%

10.69%

+7.76%

Volatility

GRNT vs. GPRK - Volatility Comparison

Granite Ridge Resources Inc (GRNT) and GeoPark Limited (GPRK) have volatilities of 18.29% and 18.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRNTGPRKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.29%

18.39%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.82%

37.28%

-4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.62%

56.18%

-14.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.14%

46.92%

-6.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.20%

50.27%

-12.07%

Dividends

GRNT vs. GPRK - Dividend Comparison

GRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.82%, more than GPRK's 2.06% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GPRK
GeoPark Limited
2.06%6.36%6.22%6.14%2.71%1.07%0.48%0.19%
GRNT
Granite Ridge Resources Inc
8.82%9.36%6.81%7.31%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GRNT vs. GPRK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Granite Ridge Resources Inc and GeoPark Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M202220232024202520260
128.40M
(GRNT) Total Revenue
(GPRK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GRNT and GPRK have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPRK has higher volatility (18.39%) compared to GRNT (18.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRNT dropped -50.26% vs GPRK's -84.04%.

GPRK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRNT and GPRK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer