GRNJ vs. VFMV
GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) and VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GRNJ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMV.
Performance
GRNJ vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRNJ achieves a 16.81% return, which is significantly higher than VFMV's 9.51% return.
GRNJ
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -4.62%
- 6M
- 8.17%
- YTD
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFMV
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 1Y
- 13.39%
- 3Y*
- 14.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- —
GRNJ vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 16.81% | 6.02% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 9.51% | 2.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRNJ and VFMV is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRNJ vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank
GRNJ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VFMV
GRNJ vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRNJ | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRNJ vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRNJ drawdown since its inception was -17.32%, smaller than the maximum VFMV drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNJ and VFMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRNJ | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.32% | -33.64% | +16.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.45% | -0.12% | -8.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.27% | -3.61% | -0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.56% | — |
Volatility
GRNJ vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRNJ | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.50% | 8.78% | +21.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 11.74% | +18.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 14.19% | +16.31% |
GRNJ vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRNJ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRNJ vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison
GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.77% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRNJ and VFMV have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNJ.
VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.
They also come from different issuers: Fundstrat and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRNJ and 0.13% for VFMV.
Find the right allocation for GRNJ and VFMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer