GRNJ vs. ISCMF
GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRNJ is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fundstrat, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. GRNJ is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. GRNJ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
GRNJ vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GRNJ having a 22.19% return and ISCMF slightly higher at 22.87%.
GRNJ
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 22.19%
- 6M
- 17.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 22.87%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRNJ vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 22.19% | 6.02% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.87% | 7.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRNJ and ISCMF is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRNJ vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
GRNJ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ISCMF
GRNJ vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRNJ | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRNJ vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRNJ drawdown since its inception was -17.32%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNJ and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRNJ | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.32% | -25.42% | +8.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.23% | -5.26% | +1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -13.35% | +9.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility
GRNJ vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRNJ | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.86% | 17.84% | +13.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.86% | 14.29% | +16.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.86% | 14.29% | +16.57% |
GRNJ vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRNJ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRNJ vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
Neither GRNJ nor ISCMF has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GRNJ and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNJ.
GRNJ and ISCMF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GRNJ is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Fundstrat and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRNJ and 0.19% for ISCMF.
Find the right allocation for GRNJ and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer