PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRMN vs. TEL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GRMN vs. TEL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) and TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRMN achieves a 17.83% return, which is significantly higher than TEL's -6.89% return. Over the past 10 years, GRMN has outperformed TEL with an annualized return of 22.02%, while TEL has yielded a comparatively lower 15.34% annualized return.


GRMN

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.62%
YTD
17.83%
6M
14.71%
1Y
16.14%
3Y*
32.81%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
22.02%

TEL

1D
1.27%
1M
1.70%
YTD
-6.89%
6M
-7.96%
1Y
28.49%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
15.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRMN vs. TEL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRMN
Garmin Ltd.
17.83%-0.06%63.25%43.12%-30.20%15.90%25.86%58.13%9.84%27.60%
TEL
TE Connectivity Ltd.
-6.89%61.60%3.51%24.62%-27.66%35.12%28.95%29.37%-18.87%39.88%

Correlation

The correlation between GRMN and TEL is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007

0.50

The correlation between GRMN and TEL shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GRMN:

$46.09B

TEL:

$62.06B

EPS

GRMN:

$8.97

TEL:

$9.78

PE Ratio

GRMN:

26.55

TEL:

21.50

PEG Ratio

GRMN:

2.13

TEL:

3.98

PS Ratio

GRMN:

6.18

TEL:

3.37

PB Ratio

GRMN:

4.97

TEL:

4.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

GRMN:

$7.46B

TEL:

$18.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GRMN:

$4.41B

TEL:

$6.55B

EBITDA (TTM)

GRMN:

$2.26B

TEL:

$4.47B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRMN vs. TEL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRMN
GRMN Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
GRMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRMN Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
GRMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRMN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

TEL
TEL Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEL Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEL Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRMN vs. TEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) and TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRMNTELDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.18

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

1.37

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.27

3.07

-1.81

GRMN vs. TEL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRMN Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the TEL Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRMN and TEL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRMN vs. TEL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRMN drawdown since its inception was -87.71%, which is greater than TEL's maximum drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRMN and TEL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRMNTELDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.71%

-81.07%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.97%

-20.85%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.97%

-22.60%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.63%

-34.26%

-20.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.63%

-47.71%

-6.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.00%

-14.72%

+3.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.54%

-13.63%

-17.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.79%

9.29%

+3.50%

Volatility

GRMN vs. TEL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) is 8.24%, while TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) has a volatility of 10.11%. This indicates that GRMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRMNTELDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.24%

10.11%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.18%

28.10%

-5.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.32%

34.13%

-3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.41%

28.12%

+2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.36%

28.39%

-0.03%

Dividends

GRMN vs. TEL - Dividend Comparison

GRMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than TEL's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRMN
Garmin Ltd.
1.51%1.70%1.44%2.27%3.10%1.92%2.01%2.30%3.32%3.42%4.21%5.41%
TEL
TE Connectivity Ltd.
1.38%1.22%1.78%1.66%1.90%1.23%1.57%1.90%2.27%1.65%2.08%1.98%

Financials

GRMN vs. TEL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Garmin Ltd. and TE Connectivity Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
1.75B
4.74B
(GRMN) Total Revenue
(TEL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GRMN vs. TEL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Garmin Ltd. and TE Connectivity Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
59.4%
36.8%
Portfolio components
GRMN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.

TEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.75B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

GRMN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported an operating income of 431.67M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.6%.

TEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported an operating income of 954.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

GRMN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported a net income of 405.08M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in a net margin of 23.1%.

TEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported a net income of 855.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GRMN and TEL have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEL has higher volatility (10.11%) compared to GRMN (8.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRMN dropped -87.71% vs TEL's -81.07%.

TEL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRMN and TEL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer