TEL vs. ASML

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML).

Performance

TEL vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TEL vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TEL TE Connectivity Ltd.	-7.85%	61.60%	3.51%	24.62%	-27.66%	35.12%	28.95%	29.37%	-18.87%	39.88%
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	23.62%	56.51%	-7.70%	39.91%	-30.49%	64.13%	66.06%	93.56%	-9.80%	56.23%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TEL : $62.08B ASML : $513.67B
EPS TEL : $6.93 ASML : $23.77
PE Ratio TEL : 30.14 ASML : 55.57
PEG Ratio TEL : 5.58 ASML : 3.99
PS Ratio TEL : 3.47 ASML : 16.35
PB Ratio TEL : 4.78 ASML : 26.20
Total Revenue (TTM) TEL : $17.92B ASML : $31.38B
Gross Profit (TTM) TEL : $6.27B ASML : $16.58B
EBITDA (TTM) TEL : $4.46B ASML : $11.94B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEL achieves a -7.85% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 23.62% return. Over the past 10 years, TEL has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of 14.98%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 30.71% annualized return.

TEL

• 1D: 5.23%
• 1M: -9.18%
• YTD: -7.85%
• 6M: -4.18%
• 1Y: 50.03%
• 3Y*: 18.75%
• 5Y*: 11.61%
• 10Y*: 14.98%

ASML

• 1D: 5.33%
• 1M: -8.94%
• YTD: 23.62%
• 6M: 36.86%
• 1Y: 101.57%
• 3Y*: 26.02%
• 5Y*: 16.89%
• 10Y*: 30.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TEL vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEL

TEL Risk / Return Rank: 82
TEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
TEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
TEL Omega Ratio Rank: 82
TEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
TEL Martin Ratio Rank: 83

ASML

ASML Risk / Return Rank: 93
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 90
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEL vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TEL	ASML	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	2.45	-0.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	3.04	-1.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.39	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	5.49	-3.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.86	15.40	-8.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TEL vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEL Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEL and ASML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TEL	ASML	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.47	2.45	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.41	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.81	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.54	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between TEL and ASML is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TEL vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

TEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than ASML's 0.71% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TEL TE Connectivity Ltd.	1.36%	1.22%	1.78%	1.66%	1.90%	1.23%	1.57%	1.90%	2.27%	1.65%	2.08%	1.98%
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	0.71%	0.97%	0.97%	0.86%	1.27%	0.50%	0.50%	1.40%	0.94%	0.64%	0.92%	0.73%

Drawdowns

TEL vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEL drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEL and ASML.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEL	ASML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.07%	-90.00%	+8.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.85%	-17.85%	-3.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.26%	-56.84%	+22.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.71%	-56.84%	+9.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.52%	-13.47%	-2.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.63%	-28.28%	+14.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.17%	6.37%	+0.80%

Volatility

TEL vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) is 11.33%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 14.88%. This indicates that TEL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEL	ASML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.33%	14.88%	-3.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.94%	29.34%	-4.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.25%	41.81%	-7.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.27%	41.55%	-14.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.90%	38.06%	-10.16%

Financials

TEL vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TE Connectivity Ltd. and ASML Holding N.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.74B and revenue of 4.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.3%.

ASML - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.47B and revenue of 8.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.1%.

TEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported an operating income of 976.00M and revenue of 4.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.

ASML - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 2.51B and revenue of 8.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.8%.

TEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported a net income of 750.00M and revenue of 4.67B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.

ASML - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.07B and revenue of 8.43B, resulting in a net margin of 24.6%.