GRMN vs. T
GRMN (Garmin Ltd.) and T (AT&T Inc.) are both stocks. GRMN operates in Scientific & Technical Instruments (Technology), while T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, GRMN returned 22.02%/yr vs 3.33%/yr for T. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GRMN vs. T - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRMN achieves a 17.83% return, which is significantly higher than T's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, GRMN has outperformed T with an annualized return of 22.02%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.33% annualized return.
GRMN
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 17.83%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- 20.22%
- 3Y*
- 32.81%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- 22.02%
T
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -12.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
GRMN vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRMN Garmin Ltd. | 17.83% | -0.06% | 63.25% | 43.12% | -30.20% | 15.90% | 25.86% | 58.13% | 9.84% | 27.60% |
T AT&T Inc. | -2.96% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRMN and T is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2000 | 0.26 |
The correlation between GRMN and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GRMN:
$8.97
T:
$3.04
GRMN:
26.55
T:
7.74
GRMN:
2.13
T:
0.32
GRMN:
6.18
T:
1.35
GRMN:
$7.46B
T:
$125.65B
GRMN:
$4.41B
T:
$105.41B
GRMN:
$2.26B
T:
$54.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRMN vs. T — Risk / Return Rank
GRMN
T
GRMN vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRMN | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.92 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | -0.59 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.27 | -1.22 | +2.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRMN vs. T - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRMN drawdown since its inception was -87.71%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRMN and T.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRMN | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.71% | -64.15% | -23.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.97% | -21.87% | -6.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.97% | -21.87% | -6.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.63% | -32.01% | -22.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.63% | -42.35% | -12.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.00% | -18.12% | +7.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.54% | -15.72% | -15.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.79% | 10.64% | +2.15% |
Volatility
GRMN vs. T - Volatility Comparison
Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) and AT&T Inc. (T) have volatilities of 8.24% and 8.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRMN | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 8.21% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.18% | 17.80% | +4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.32% | 22.13% | +8.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.41% | 24.01% | +6.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.36% | 23.73% | +4.63% |
Dividends
GRMN vs. T - Dividend Comparison
GRMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than T's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRMN Garmin Ltd. | 1.51% | 1.70% | 1.44% | 2.27% | 3.10% | 1.92% | 2.01% | 2.30% | 3.32% | 3.42% | 4.21% | 5.41% |
T AT&T Inc. | 4.71% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
GRMN vs. T - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Garmin Ltd. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GRMN and T have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRMN has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to T (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRMN dropped -87.71% vs T's -64.15%.
GRMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRMN and T
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer