GRID vs. PIPE
GRID (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund) and PIPE (Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. GRID is passively managed, while PIPE is actively managed. Over the past year, GRID returned 30.04% vs 30.59% for PIPE. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GRID charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PIPE.
Performance
GRID vs. PIPE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRID achieves a 19.50% return, which is significantly lower than PIPE's 28.11% return.
GRID
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- 6M
- 10.03%
- YTD
- 19.50%
- 1Y
- 30.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.76%
- 5Y*
- 14.44%
- 10Y*
- 18.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.60%
PIPE
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- 6M
- 20.40%
- YTD
- 28.11%
- 1Y
- 30.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $102.61M | $99.71M | $138.67M | |
| $149.15K | $94.70K | $92.96K |
GRID vs. PIPE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 19.50% | 24.68% |
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 28.11% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRID and PIPE is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.19 |
The correlation between GRID and PIPE shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GRID vs. PIPE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GRID
PIPE
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
GRID
PIPE
-
Technology
GRID
PIPE
-
Utilities
GRID
PIPE
Consumer Cyclical
GRID
PIPE
-
Energy
GRID
PIPE
Basic Materials
GRID
PIPE
-
Communication Services
GRID
-
PIPE
-
Consumer Defensive
GRID
-
PIPE
-
Financial Services
GRID
-
PIPE
Healthcare
GRID
-
PIPE
-
Real Estate
GRID
-
PIPE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRID vs. PIPE — Risk / Return Rank
GRID
PIPE
GRID vs. PIPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRID | PIPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.35 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 4.19 | -2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.77 | 10.00 | -3.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRID vs. PIPE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, which is greater than PIPE's maximum drawdown of -15.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and PIPE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRID | PIPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | -15.69% | -24.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.82% | -7.33% | -8.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.53% | -3.77% | -4.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -3.94% | -4.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 3.07% | +1.38% |
Volatility
GRID vs. PIPE - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a higher volatility of 8.94% compared to Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) at 5.57%. This indicates that GRID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIPE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRID | PIPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.94% | 5.57% | +3.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.34% | 12.06% | +8.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.13% | 14.95% | +8.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 18.62% | +3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.83% | 18.62% | +4.21% |
GRID vs. PIPE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than PIPE's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRID vs. PIPE - Dividend Comparison
GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than PIPE's 3.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 0.79% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 1.26% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.23% |
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.75% | 3.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRID and PIPE have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRID has higher volatility (8.94%) compared to PIPE (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRID dropped -40.56% vs PIPE's -15.69%.
On 1-year performance, PIPE leads with 30.59% vs 30.04% for GRID. On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, PIPE has been the lower-risk option at 5.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PIPE has performed better with a 30.59% return vs 30.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PIPE.
PIPE has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 0.79% for GRID.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GRID and 0.75% for PIPE.
PIPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRID and PIPE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer