PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRID vs. IFRA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRID vs. IFRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRID achieves a 19.50% return, which is significantly higher than IFRA's 16.98% return.


GRID

1D
1.49%
1M
-1.17%
6M
10.03%
YTD
19.50%
1Y
30.04%
3Y*
22.76%
5Y*
14.44%
10Y*
18.61%
ALL TIME*
12.60%

IFRA

1D
0.84%
1M
-1.85%
6M
9.25%
YTD
16.98%
1Y
24.24%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
13.66%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$102.61M$99.71M$138.67M
$23.49M$21.34M$23.79M

GRID vs. IFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
19.50%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-19.55%
IFRA
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
16.98%15.90%17.02%13.42%-3.32%29.81%7.37%27.00%-7.97%

Correlation

The correlation between GRID and IFRA is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018

0.72

The correlation between GRID and IFRA shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GRID vs. IFRA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GRID
IFRA

Industrials

23.6%
36.9%

Technology

12.6%

-

Utilities

3.9%
37.8%

Consumer Cyclical

2.4%
0.0%

Energy

1.6%
7.9%

Basic Materials

0.8%
17.1%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

GRID
23.6%
IFRA
36.9%

Technology

GRID
12.6%
IFRA

-

Utilities

GRID
3.9%
IFRA
37.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GRID
2.4%
IFRA
0.0%

Energy

GRID
1.6%
IFRA
7.9%

Basic Materials

GRID
0.8%
IFRA
17.1%

Communication Services

GRID

-

IFRA

-

Consumer Defensive

GRID

-

IFRA
0.0%

Financial Services

GRID

-

IFRA

-

Healthcare

GRID

-

IFRA

-

Real Estate

GRID

-

IFRA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRID vs. IFRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

IFRA
IFRA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GRID vs. IFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRIDIFRADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.27

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

2.90

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.77

9.47

-2.70

GRID vs. IFRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRID Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the IFRA Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRID and IFRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRID vs. IFRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, roughly equal to the maximum IFRA drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and IFRA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRIDIFRADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

-41.06%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.82%

-8.40%

-7.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.62%

-19.93%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-19.93%

-9.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.53%

-4.67%

-3.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-5.09%

-3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.45%

2.57%

+1.88%

Volatility

GRID vs. IFRA - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a higher volatility of 8.94% compared to iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) at 4.07%. This indicates that GRID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRIDIFRADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.94%

4.07%

+4.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.34%

12.01%

+8.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.13%

15.39%

+7.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.70%

17.87%

+3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.83%

21.28%

+1.55%

GRID vs. IFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than IFRA's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRID vs. IFRA - Dividend Comparison

GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than IFRA's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.79%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
IFRA
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
1.59%1.84%1.75%1.98%1.98%1.63%2.08%1.68%2.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRID and IFRA have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (8.94%) compared to IFRA (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRID dropped -40.56% vs IFRA's -41.06%.

On 5-year performance, GRID leads with 14.44% vs 13.66% for IFRA. On fees, IFRA is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, IFRA has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GRID has performed better with a 14.44% return vs 13.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFRA is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

IFRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.79% for GRID.

GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while IFRA tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index (TR). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GRID and 0.30% for IFRA.

IFRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRID and IFRA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer