GRID vs. FHLC

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

GRID (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund) and FHLC (Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while FHLC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GRID returned 19.76%/yr vs 9.76%/yr for FHLC. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GRID charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FHLC.

Performance

GRID vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRID achieves a 23.59% return, which is significantly higher than FHLC's 0.03% return. Over the past 10 years, GRID has outperformed FHLC with an annualized return of 19.76%, while FHLC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.76% annualized return.

GRID

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -4.18%
• YTD: 23.59%
• 6M: 24.02%
• 1Y: 41.72%
• 3Y*: 23.21%
• 5Y*: 16.83%
• 10Y*: 19.76%

FHLC

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 4.40%
• YTD: 0.03%
• 6M: 0.58%
• 1Y: 15.99%
• 3Y*: 7.18%
• 5Y*: 4.76%
• 10Y*: 9.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRID vs. FHLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund	23.59%	29.65%	15.18%	21.57%	-13.89%	27.65%	48.84%	42.80%	-22.69%	27.44%
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	0.03%	15.42%	2.48%	2.58%	-5.55%	20.39%	18.13%	21.94%	4.71%	23.34%

Correlation

The correlation between GRID and FHLC is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013	0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between GRID and FHLC has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GRID vs. FHLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GRID	FHLC
Industrials	65.2%	0.0%
Utilities	20.4%	-
Technology	11.0%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	3.5%	-
Basic Materials	0.0%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Healthcare	-	99.6%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

GRID vs. FHLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRID

GRID Risk / Return Rank: 73
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 69
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 78

FHLC

FHLC Risk / Return Rank: 34
FHLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FHLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FHLC Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FHLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
FHLC Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRID vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GRID	FHLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.09	+0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	1.72	+0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.19	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	1.55	+2.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.89	3.86	+9.03

GRID vs. FHLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRID Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the FHLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRID and FHLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GRID vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, which is greater than FHLC's maximum drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and FHLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRID	FHLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.56%	-28.76%	-11.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.73%	-10.38%	-1.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.77%	-16.87%	-3.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.64%	-17.73%	-11.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.56%	-28.76%	-11.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.40%	-3.15%	-2.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.42%	-5.19%	-3.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	4.16%	-0.91%

Volatility

GRID vs. FHLC - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) at 4.87%. This indicates that GRID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GRID	FHLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.56%	4.87%	+4.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.70%	10.50%	+7.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.73%	14.69%	+6.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.24%	15.02%	+6.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.90%	16.84%	+6.06%

GRID vs. FHLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLC's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

GRID vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison

GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than FHLC's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	1.37%	1.40%	1.51%	1.40%	1.30%	1.16%	1.45%	1.18%	1.38%	1.38%	1.40%	2.07%
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund	0.80%	1.01%	1.06%	1.23%	1.26%	0.63%	0.68%	1.26%	1.28%	1.07%	1.07%	1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GRID and FHLC in my portfolio?

GRID and FHLC have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GRID or FHLC?

GRID has higher volatility (9.56%) compared to FHLC (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRID dropped -40.56% vs FHLC's -28.76%.

Which ETF is better, GRID or FHLC?

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 19.76% vs 9.76% for FHLC. On fees, FHLC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FHLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GRID or FHLC?

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 19.76% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GRID or FHLC?

FHLC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GRID or FHLC?

FHLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.80% for GRID.

What is the main difference between GRID and FHLC?

GRID is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while FHLC is Health & Biotech Equities. GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while FHLC tracks MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GRID and 0.08% for FHLC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.