PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GREZX vs. PRRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GREZX vs. PRRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Global Real Estate Securities Fund (GREZX) and PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GREZX achieves a 7.42% return, which is significantly lower than PRRSX's 12.29% return. Over the past 10 years, GREZX has underperformed PRRSX with an annualized return of 3.75%, while PRRSX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.58% annualized return.


GREZX

1D
0.40%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
7.42%
6M
7.23%
1Y
10.92%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
0.85%
10Y*
3.75%

PRRSX

1D
0.57%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
12.29%
6M
10.24%
1Y
16.29%
3Y*
11.03%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*
6.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GREZX vs. PRRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GREZX
GuideStone Funds Global Real Estate Securities Fund
7.42%8.53%2.87%11.06%-27.58%27.23%-4.84%24.44%-4.88%10.74%
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
12.29%5.21%5.11%12.30%-29.37%53.74%-3.80%29.61%-6.42%4.32%

Correlation

The correlation between GREZX and PRRSX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.91

The correlation between GREZX and PRRSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GREZX vs. PRRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GREZX
GREZX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
GREZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GREZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GREZX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GREZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GREZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

PRRSX
PRRSX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PRRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GREZX vs. PRRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Global Real Estate Securities Fund (GREZX) and PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GREZXPRRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.19

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

1.73

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.87

5.95

-2.08

GREZX vs. PRRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GREZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the PRRSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GREZX and PRRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GREZXPRRSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

1.10

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.19

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.30

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.35

-0.26

Drawdowns

GREZX vs. PRRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GREZX drawdown since its inception was -77.41%, roughly equal to the maximum PRRSX drawdown of -77.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GREZX and PRRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GREZXPRRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.41%

-77.82%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.94%

-9.05%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-17.77%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.97%

-37.14%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.52%

-45.75%

+5.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-3.11%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.50%

-13.09%

-5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

2.62%

+0.03%

Volatility

GREZX vs. PRRSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Global Real Estate Securities Fund (GREZX) is 3.57%, while PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that GREZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GREZXPRRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

4.33%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

10.18%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

14.26%

-2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.91%

20.20%

-4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

21.87%

-4.65%

GREZX vs. PRRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GREZX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than PRRSX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

GREZX vs. PRRSX - Dividend Comparison

GREZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than PRRSX's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GREZX
GuideStone Funds Global Real Estate Securities Fund
3.38%3.63%2.39%2.97%0.57%4.32%2.36%7.50%4.40%3.94%4.33%6.51%
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
0.79%2.19%0.61%0.00%18.62%34.01%7.21%7.99%0.81%1.67%0.66%8.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, GREZX and PRRSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRRSX has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to GREZX (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GREZX dropped -77.41% vs PRRSX's -77.82%.

PRRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GREZX and PRRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer