GREK vs. PAVE
GREK (Global X MSCI Greece ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GREK is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Greece Select 25-50, while PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GREK returned 24.04%/yr vs 17.52%/yr for PAVE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GREK charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
GREK vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GREK achieves a 11.36% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 20.55% return.
GREK
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 11.36%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 37.72%
- 3Y*
- 33.69%
- 5Y*
- 24.04%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
PAVE
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 20.55%
- 6M
- 19.00%
- 1Y
- 37.89%
- 3Y*
- 27.31%
- 5Y*
- 17.52%
- 10Y*
- —
GREK vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 11.36% | 76.11% | 9.53% | 42.72% | 3.64% | 6.14% | -13.89% | 50.20% | -31.25% | 35.32% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 20.55% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 14.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between GREK and PAVE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017 | 0.47 |
GREK vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GREK
PAVE
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
GREK
PAVE
-
Industrials
GREK
PAVE
Utilities
GREK
PAVE
Consumer Cyclical
GREK
PAVE
-
Energy
GREK
PAVE
Communication Services
GREK
PAVE
-
Basic Materials
GREK
PAVE
Consumer Defensive
GREK
PAVE
Real Estate
GREK
PAVE
-
Healthcare
GREK
-
PAVE
-
Technology
GREK
-
PAVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GREK vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
GREK
PAVE
GREK vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GREK | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.34 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 3.19 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.52 | 11.72 | -6.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GREK | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 2.02 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 0.81 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.68 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
GREK vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GREK drawdown since its inception was -79.50%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GREK and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GREK | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.50% | -44.08% | -35.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.32% | -11.91% | -9.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.63% | -26.23% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.46% | -26.23% | -4.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.92% | -1.27% | -3.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.32% | -6.24% | -39.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.86% | 3.24% | +3.62% |
Volatility
GREK vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 6.10%. This indicates that GREK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GREK | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.56% | 6.10% | +2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.28% | 15.18% | +5.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.95% | 18.80% | +5.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.37% | 21.60% | +2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.82% | 24.38% | +5.44% |
GREK vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GREK has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
GREK vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
GREK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than PAVE's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 3.11% | 3.46% | 4.63% | 2.61% | 2.82% | 2.16% | 2.62% | 2.25% | 2.41% | 2.13% | 1.95% | 1.52% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.76% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GREK and PAVE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GREK has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to PAVE (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GREK dropped -79.50% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, GREK leads with 24.04% vs 17.52% for PAVE. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, PAVE has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GREK has performed better with a 24.04% return vs 17.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for GREK.
GREK has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 0.76% for PAVE.
GREK is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PAVE is Industrials Equities. GREK tracks MSCI All Greece Select 25-50, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for GREK and 0.47% for PAVE.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GREK and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer