GREK vs. GDXJ
GREK (Global X MSCI Greece ETF) and GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GREK is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Greece Select 25-50, while GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GREK returned 16.01%/yr vs 12.00%/yr for GDXJ. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GREK charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for GDXJ.
Performance
GREK vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GREK achieves a 15.45% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's -8.37% return. Over the past 10 years, GREK has outperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of 16.01%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively lower 12.00% annualized return.
GREK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 5.63%
- YTD
- 15.45%
- 6M
- 15.54%
- 1Y
- 38.63%
- 3Y*
- 32.67%
- 5Y*
- 24.30%
- 10Y*
- 16.01%
GDXJ
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -19.14%
- YTD
- -8.37%
- 6M
- -6.68%
- 1Y
- 51.06%
- 3Y*
- 44.17%
- 5Y*
- 16.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
GREK vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 15.45% | 76.11% | 9.53% | 42.72% | 3.64% | 6.14% | -13.89% | 50.20% | -31.25% | 34.80% |
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -8.37% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between GREK and GDXJ is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2011 | 0.20 |
The correlation between GREK and GDXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GREK vs. GDXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GREK
GDXJ
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Financial Services
GREK
GDXJ
-
Industrials
GREK
GDXJ
-
Utilities
GREK
GDXJ
-
Consumer Cyclical
GREK
GDXJ
-
Energy
GREK
GDXJ
-
Communication Services
GREK
GDXJ
-
Basic Materials
GREK
GDXJ
Consumer Defensive
GREK
GDXJ
-
Real Estate
GREK
GDXJ
-
Healthcare
GREK
-
GDXJ
-
Technology
GREK
-
GDXJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GREK vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank
GREK
GDXJ
GREK vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GREK | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.20 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 1.30 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.62 | 3.55 | +2.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GREK vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GREK drawdown since its inception was -79.50%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GREK and GDXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GREK | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.50% | -88.66% | +9.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.32% | -39.47% | +18.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.63% | -39.47% | +16.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.46% | -49.76% | +19.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.04% | -57.77% | +0.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -33.25% | +31.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.25% | -60.45% | +15.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.90% | 14.41% | -7.51% |
Volatility
GREK vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) is 8.69%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 19.46%. This indicates that GREK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GREK | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.69% | 19.46% | -10.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.65% | 43.41% | -22.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.35% | 51.54% | -27.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.44% | 41.50% | -17.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.71% | 44.23% | -14.52% |
GREK vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GREK has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
GREK vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
GREK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than GDXJ's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.54% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 3.00% | 3.46% | 4.63% | 2.61% | 2.82% | 2.16% | 2.62% | 2.25% | 2.41% | 2.13% | 1.95% | 1.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GREK and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXJ has higher volatility (19.46%) compared to GREK (8.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GREK dropped -79.50% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.
On 10-year performance, GREK leads with 16.01% vs 12.00% for GDXJ. On fees, GDXJ is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, GREK has been the lower-risk option at 8.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GREK has performed better with a 16.01% return vs 12.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDXJ is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for GREK.
GREK has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 2.54% for GDXJ.
GREK is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while GDXJ is Gold. GREK tracks MSCI All Greece Select 25-50, while GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for GREK and 0.52% for GDXJ.
GREK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GREK and GDXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer