PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRAL vs. PAVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRAL vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GRAIL, Inc (GRAL) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRAL achieves a -17.90% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 20.61% return.


GRAL

1D
2.49%
1M
1.68%
6M
-32.22%
YTD
-17.90%
1Y
114.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
87.87%

PAVE

1D
2.09%
1M
0.68%
6M
12.05%
YTD
20.61%
1Y
28.93%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
17.87%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$34.34M$35.18M$43.99M
$108.51M$123.53M$109.57M

GRAL vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GRAL
GRAIL, Inc
-17.90%379.50%-4.19%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
20.61%19.36%8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GRAL and PAVE is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRAL vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GRAL
GRAL Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GRAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GRAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GRAL vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GRAIL, Inc (GRAL) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRALPAVEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

2.44

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.35

8.00

-4.65

GRAL vs. PAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the PAVE Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRAL and PAVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRAL vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRAL drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRAL and PAVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRALPAVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.92%

-44.08%

-18.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.92%

-11.91%

-51.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.45%

-3.92%

-35.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.37%

-6.19%

-22.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.20%

3.62%

+30.58%

Volatility

GRAL vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison

GRAIL, Inc (GRAL) has a higher volatility of 19.29% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 6.40%. This indicates that GRAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRALPAVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.29%

6.40%

+12.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

89.28%

16.70%

+72.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.40%

20.47%

+77.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

103.95%

21.72%

+82.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

103.95%

24.37%

+79.58%

Dividends

GRAL vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison

GRAL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRAL
GRAIL, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.75%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRAL and PAVE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRAL has higher volatility (19.29%) compared to PAVE (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRAL dropped -62.92% vs PAVE's -44.08%.

PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRAL and PAVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer