PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRAL vs. REMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRAL vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GRAIL, Inc (GRAL) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRAL achieves a -28.60% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 24.22% return.


GRAL

1D
-1.59%
1M
-9.05%
YTD
-28.60%
6M
-33.13%
1Y
41.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

REMX

1D
-5.62%
1M
-5.16%
YTD
24.22%
6M
22.61%
1Y
139.49%
3Y*
5.61%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
10.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRAL vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GRAL
GRAIL, Inc
-28.60%379.50%-4.19%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
24.22%92.95%-7.90%

Correlation

The correlation between GRAL and REMX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRAL vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRAL
GRAL Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
GRAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GRAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRAL Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRAL vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GRAIL, Inc (GRAL) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRALREMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.38

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

6.01

-5.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.22

15.83

-14.61

GRAL vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRAL Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRAL and REMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRAL vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRAL drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRAL and REMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRALREMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.92%

-90.20%

+27.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.92%

-23.35%

-39.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.35%

-57.95%

+10.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.71%

-66.82%

+39.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.52%

8.85%

+25.67%

Volatility

GRAL vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

GRAIL, Inc (GRAL) has a higher volatility of 22.58% compared to VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) at 16.71%. This indicates that GRAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRALREMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.58%

16.71%

+5.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

91.04%

37.35%

+53.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

99.60%

49.97%

+49.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

105.83%

40.71%

+65.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

105.83%

37.16%

+68.67%

Dividends

GRAL vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

GRAL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRAL
GRAIL, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
1.42%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRAL and REMX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRAL has higher volatility (22.58%) compared to REMX (16.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRAL dropped -62.92% vs REMX's -90.20%.

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRAL and REMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer