PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRAG vs. COIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRAG vs. COIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF (GRAG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRAG achieves a -56.61% return, which is significantly higher than COIG's -62.75% return.


GRAG

1D
-4.47%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
-56.61%
6M
-60.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COIG

1D
1.70%
1M
-24.51%
YTD
-62.75%
6M
-69.27%
1Y
-85.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRAG vs. COIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GRAG and COIG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRAG vs. COIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRAG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


COIG
COIG Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
COIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
COIG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
COIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
COIG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRAG vs. COIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF (GRAG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRAGCOIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

GRAG vs. COIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRAG vs. COIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRAG drawdown since its inception was -65.33%, smaller than the maximum COIG drawdown of -92.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRAG and COIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRAGCOIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.33%

-92.67%

+27.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.91%

-91.63%

+30.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.46%

-53.05%

+11.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

68.85%

Volatility

GRAG vs. COIG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRAGCOIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.21%

135.60%

-65.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.21%

145.26%

-75.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.21%

145.26%

-75.05%

GRAG vs. COIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GRAG and COIG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

GRAG vs. COIG - Dividend Comparison

Neither GRAG nor COIG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GRAG and COIG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GRAG and COIG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

GRAG and COIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRAG and COIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer