PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQSCX vs. DFISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQSCX vs. DFISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQSCX achieves a 16.40% return, which is significantly higher than DFISX's 9.65% return.


GQSCX

1D
0.51%
1M
3.71%
YTD
16.40%
6M
16.89%
1Y
42.75%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*

DFISX

1D
0.18%
1M
3.43%
YTD
9.65%
6M
13.12%
1Y
26.38%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
8.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQSCX vs. DFISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GQSCX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio
16.40%12.22%11.49%18.94%-8.48%31.77%7.60%22.17%-11.32%1.07%
DFISX
DFA International Small Company Portfolio
9.65%36.35%3.76%14.46%-17.13%10.71%9.27%24.18%-19.42%-1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between GQSCX and DFISX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2017

0.69

The correlation between GQSCX and DFISX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQSCX vs. DFISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQSCX
GQSCX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GQSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
GQSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

DFISX
DFISX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DFISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFISX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DFISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFISX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQSCX vs. DFISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GQSCXDFISXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.34

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.21

2.15

+3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.24

7.90

+10.33

GQSCX vs. DFISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the DFISX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQSCX and DFISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GQSCXDFISXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

1.87

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.46

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.47

-0.01

Drawdowns

GQSCX vs. DFISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQSCX drawdown since its inception was -46.87%, smaller than the maximum DFISX drawdown of -60.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQSCX and DFISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQSCXDFISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.87%

-60.66%

+13.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-11.96%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.83%

-13.68%

-15.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.83%

-35.06%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.31%

+1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.18%

-11.64%

+3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

3.24%

-0.76%

Volatility

GQSCX vs. DFISX - Volatility Comparison

Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) at 3.78%. This indicates that GQSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQSCXDFISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

3.78%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.40%

11.00%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.35%

13.77%

+4.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.86%

15.89%

+5.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.81%

16.20%

+8.61%

GQSCX vs. DFISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQSCX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DFISX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQSCX vs. DFISX - Dividend Comparison

GQSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than DFISX's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFISX
DFA International Small Company Portfolio
2.87%3.19%3.39%3.01%3.51%3.06%1.71%4.54%7.74%1.27%4.44%4.47%
GQSCX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio
2.67%3.01%10.53%0.70%9.45%10.41%0.51%0.59%0.77%0.14%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQSCX and DFISX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GQSCX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to DFISX (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQSCX dropped -46.87% vs DFISX's -60.66%.

GQSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQSCX and DFISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer