PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQQQ vs. SGRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQQQ vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQQQ achieves a 21.09% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 48.90% return.


GQQQ

1D
-0.37%
1M
6.40%
YTD
21.09%
6M
20.15%
1Y
40.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SGRT

1D
-1.69%
1M
9.59%
YTD
48.90%
6M
51.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQQQ vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GQQQ
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF
21.09%8.00%
SGRT
SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF
48.90%25.25%

Correlation

The correlation between GQQQ and SGRT is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQQQ vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQQQ
GQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SGRT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQQQ vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GQQQSGRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.41

GQQQ vs. SGRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GQQQSGRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

3.63

-2.37

Drawdowns

GQQQ vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQQQ drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQQQ and SGRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQQQSGRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.36%

-17.87%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-1.69%

+1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-3.10%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

Volatility

GQQQ vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQQQSGRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

33.40%

-17.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.20%

33.40%

-13.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.20%

33.40%

-13.20%

GQQQ vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQQQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQQQ vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

GQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GQQQ
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF
0.40%0.46%0.11%
SGRT
SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF
0.11%0.16%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQQQ and SGRT have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GQQQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GQQQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.

GQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.

Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GQQQ and 0.59% for SGRT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQQQ and SGRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer