GQQQ vs. ITOT
GQQQ (Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GQQQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Astoria, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. Over the past year, GQQQ returned 40.82% vs 28.12% for ITOT. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GQQQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
GQQQ vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GQQQ achieves a 21.53% return, which is significantly higher than ITOT's 11.25% return.
GQQQ
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 8.79%
- YTD
- 21.53%
- 6M
- 20.71%
- 1Y
- 40.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
GQQQ vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GQQQ Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF | 21.53% | 17.37% | 2.66% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.00% | 3.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between GQQQ and ITOT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between GQQQ and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GQQQ vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
GQQQ
ITOT
GQQQ vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GQQQ | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.42 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | 3.17 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.65 | 14.57 | +2.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GQQQ | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 2.32 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | 0.57 | +0.71 |
Drawdowns
GQQQ vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQQQ drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQQQ and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQQQ | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.36% | -55.20% | +32.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -8.90% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.73% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -6.97% | +3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 1.94% | +0.52% |
Volatility
GQQQ vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.99%. This indicates that GQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GQQQ | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 2.99% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 9.13% | +3.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.65% | 12.20% | +3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.22% | 17.36% | +2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.22% | 18.26% | +1.96% |
GQQQ vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQQQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
GQQQ vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
GQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than ITOT's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQQQ Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, GQQQ and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GQQQ has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQQQ dropped -22.36% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 1-year performance, GQQQ leads with 40.82% vs 28.12% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GQQQ has performed better with a 40.82% return vs 28.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GQQQ.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.40% for GQQQ.
GQQQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Astoria and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GQQQ and 0.03% for ITOT.
GQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GQQQ and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer