GQQQ vs. IQM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM).

GQQQ and IQM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GQQQ is managed by Astoria. It was launched on Sep 30, 2024. IQM is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020.

Performance

GQQQ vs. IQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GQQQ vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GQQQ Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF	-2.42%	17.37%	2.66%
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	3.20%	30.76%	7.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQQQ achieves a -2.42% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 3.20% return.

GQQQ

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -4.29%
• YTD: -2.42%
• 6M: -1.49%
• 1Y: 24.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IQM

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -3.98%
• YTD: 3.20%
• 6M: 2.05%
• 1Y: 57.05%
• 3Y*: 26.96%
• 5Y*: 15.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQQQ vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQQQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.

IQM

Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF

GQQQ

Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF

Return for Risk

GQQQ vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQQQ

GQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 68
GQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
GQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
GQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 65
GQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
GQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 74

IQM

IQM Risk / Return Rank: 87
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 81
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQQQ vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GQQQ	IQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	1.72	-0.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	2.33	-0.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.33	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	4.00	-1.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.85	12.47	-3.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GQQQ vs. IQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the IQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQQQ and IQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GQQQ	IQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.17	1.72	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.78	-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between GQQQ and IQM is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GQQQ vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison

GQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GQQQ Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF	0.50%	0.46%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	0.01%

Drawdowns

GQQQ vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQQQ drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, smaller than the maximum IQM drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQQQ and IQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQQQ	IQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.36%	-44.91%	+22.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.17%	-14.71%	+2.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.53%	-6.86%	+0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.36%	-12.55%	+9.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	4.72%	-1.83%

Volatility

GQQQ vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) is 6.98%, while Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a volatility of 12.71%. This indicates that GQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GQQQ	IQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.98%	12.71%	-5.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.79%	23.53%	-10.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.30%	33.40%	-12.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.57%	28.67%	-8.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.57%	30.73%	-10.16%