GQGU vs. WTAI
GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) and WTAI (WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GQGU is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by GQG Partners, while WTAI is a Technology Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence & Innovation Index. GQGU is actively managed, while WTAI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.36, they often move in opposite directions. GQGU charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WTAI.
Performance
GQGU vs. WTAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GQGU achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly lower than WTAI's 53.91% return.
GQGU
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- -3.53%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 4.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTAI
- 1D
- -7.24%
- 1M
- 7.76%
- YTD
- 53.91%
- 6M
- 53.20%
- 1Y
- 96.79%
- 3Y*
- 35.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GQGU vs. WTAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 4.84% | -1.12% |
WTAI WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund | 53.91% | 21.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between GQGU and WTAI is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | -0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GQGU vs. WTAI — Risk / Return Rank
GQGU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WTAI
GQGU vs. WTAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund (WTAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GQGU | WTAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.46 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 19.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GQGU vs. WTAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQGU drawdown since its inception was -8.41%, smaller than the maximum WTAI drawdown of -45.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQGU and WTAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQGU | WTAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -45.96% | +37.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.23% | -7.24% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.71% | -19.68% | +16.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.06% | — |
Volatility
GQGU vs. WTAI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GQGU | WTAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 27.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.54% | 32.63% | -22.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.54% | 31.77% | -21.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.54% | 31.77% | -21.23% |
GQGU vs. WTAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQGU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than WTAI's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GQGU vs. WTAI - Dividend Comparison
GQGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than WTAI's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WTAI WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund | 1.17% | 1.81% | 0.19% | 0.24% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GQGU and WTAI have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WTAI is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WTAI is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for GQGU.
WTAI has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.97% for GQGU.
GQGU is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while WTAI is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: GQG Partners and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for GQGU and 0.45% for WTAI.
Find the right allocation for GQGU and WTAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer