PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQGU vs. TTEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQGU vs. TTEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and T. Rowe Price Technology ETF (TTEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQGU achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly lower than TTEQ's 37.85% return.


GQGU

1D
-0.95%
1M
-6.61%
YTD
2.40%
6M
2.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TTEQ

1D
3.77%
1M
11.97%
YTD
37.85%
6M
41.46%
1Y
62.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQGU vs. TTEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF
2.40%-1.12%
TTEQ
T. Rowe Price Technology ETF
37.85%11.34%

Correlation

The correlation between GQGU and TTEQ is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025

-0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQGU vs. TTEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQGU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


TTEQ
TTEQ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TTEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
TTEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQGU vs. TTEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and T. Rowe Price Technology ETF (TTEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GQGUTTEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.42

GQGU vs. TTEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GQGU vs. TTEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQGU drawdown since its inception was -8.41%, smaller than the maximum TTEQ drawdown of -26.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQGU and TTEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQGUTTEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-26.97%

+18.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.41%

-1.23%

-7.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.67%

-4.82%

+2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.53%

Volatility

GQGU vs. TTEQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQGUTTEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.39%

25.75%

-15.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.39%

28.45%

-18.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.39%

28.45%

-18.06%

GQGU vs. TTEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQGU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TTEQ's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQGU vs. TTEQ - Dividend Comparison

GQGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, while TTEQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF
0.99%1.02%
TTEQ
T. Rowe Price Technology ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQGU and TTEQ have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for TTEQ.

GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for TTEQ.

GQGU is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TTEQ is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: GQG Partners and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for GQGU and 0.63% for TTEQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQGU and TTEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer