PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTEQ vs. PRWCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TTEQ vs. PRWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Technology ETF (TTEQ) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TTEQ vs. PRWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TTEQ
T. Rowe Price Technology ETF
-5.44%24.25%3.92%
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
-3.22%20.92%0.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTEQ achieves a -5.44% return, which is significantly lower than PRWCX's -3.22% return.


TTEQ

1D
1.63%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
-5.44%
6M
-5.46%
1Y
29.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PRWCX

1D
1.91%
1M
-2.92%
YTD
-3.22%
6M
5.51%
1Y
16.80%
3Y*
13.72%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TTEQ vs. PRWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTEQ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TTEQ vs. PRWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTEQ
TTEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TTEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
TTEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

PRWCX
PRWCX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PRWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PRWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTEQ vs. PRWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Technology ETF (TTEQ) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TTEQPRWCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

1.27

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.61

2.37

-0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

2.34

-0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.54

9.70

-4.16

TTEQ vs. PRWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the PRWCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTEQ and PRWCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TTEQPRWCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

1.27

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.90

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between TTEQ and PRWCX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TTEQ vs. PRWCX - Dividend Comparison

TTEQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRWCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.24%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TTEQ
T. Rowe Price Technology ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
16.24%15.72%10.38%4.15%9.44%9.23%7.97%5.83%7.46%6.82%3.51%9.86%

Drawdowns

TTEQ vs. PRWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTEQ drawdown since its inception was -26.97%, smaller than the maximum PRWCX drawdown of -41.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTEQ and PRWCX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TTEQPRWCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.97%

-41.77%

+14.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.31%

-6.80%

-10.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.99%

-4.47%

-7.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.11%

-3.34%

-1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.55%

1.64%

+3.91%

Volatility

TTEQ vs. PRWCX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Technology ETF (TTEQ) has a higher volatility of 9.88% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) at 3.64%. This indicates that TTEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TTEQPRWCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.88%

3.64%

+6.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.38%

9.78%

+8.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.31%

13.57%

+14.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.17%

13.24%

+13.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.17%

12.98%

+14.19%