GQGU vs. SHOC
GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) and SHOC (Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GQGU is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by GQG Partners, while SHOC is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index - Benchmark TR Gross. GQGU is actively managed, while SHOC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. GQGU charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SHOC.
Performance
GQGU vs. SHOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GQGU achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than SHOC's 81.69% return.
GQGU
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- 2.89%
- 6M
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHOC
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- 15.76%
- YTD
- 81.69%
- 6M
- 81.47%
- 1Y
- 152.44%
- 3Y*
- 56.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GQGU vs. SHOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 2.89% | -1.12% |
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 81.69% | 25.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between GQGU and SHOC is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | -0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GQGU vs. SHOC — Risk / Return Rank
GQGU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SHOC
GQGU vs. SHOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GQGU | SHOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.61 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 10.51 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 37.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GQGU vs. SHOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQGU drawdown since its inception was -8.41%, smaller than the maximum SHOC drawdown of -37.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQGU and SHOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQGU | SHOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -37.54% | +29.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.97% | 0.00% | -7.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -7.44% | +4.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.12% | — |
Volatility
GQGU vs. SHOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GQGU | SHOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.38% | 34.93% | -24.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.38% | 35.86% | -25.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.38% | 35.86% | -25.48% |
GQGU vs. SHOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQGU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SHOC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GQGU vs. SHOC - Dividend Comparison
GQGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than SHOC's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.99% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 0.13% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.65% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GQGU and SHOC have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SHOC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SHOC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for GQGU.
GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.13% for SHOC.
GQGU is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SHOC is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: GQG Partners and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for GQGU and 0.40% for SHOC.
Find the right allocation for GQGU and SHOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer