GQGU vs. FITZ
GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GQGU charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FITZ.
Performance
GQGU vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GQGU
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -1.69%
- YTD
- 6.44%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FITZ
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GQGU vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | -0.46% |
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between GQGU and FITZ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GQGU vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GQGU | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | -7.29 | +7.87 |
Drawdowns
GQGU vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQGU drawdown since its inception was -6.65%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -1.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQGU and FITZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQGU | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -1.97% | -4.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.80% | -1.97% | -2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.55% | -1.08% | -1.47% |
Volatility
GQGU vs. FITZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GQGU | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.12% | 8.74% | +1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.12% | 8.74% | +1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.12% | 8.74% | +1.38% |
GQGU vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQGU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GQGU vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison
GQGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GQGU and FITZ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.
GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.
They also come from different issuers: GQG Partners and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for GQGU and 0.75% for FITZ.
Find the right allocation for GQGU and FITZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer