GQGU vs. AIQ
GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GQGU is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by GQG Partners, while AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. GQGU is actively managed, while AIQ is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.31, they often move in opposite directions. GQGU charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.
Performance
GQGU vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GQGU achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 35.98% return.
GQGU
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIQ
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 21.10%
- YTD
- 35.98%
- 6M
- 36.15%
- 1Y
- 69.19%
- 3Y*
- 37.50%
- 5Y*
- 19.07%
- 10Y*
- —
GQGU vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 6.60% | -1.14% |
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 35.98% | 17.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between GQGU and AIQ is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GQGU vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank
GQGU
AIQ
GQGU vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GQGU | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.84 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
GQGU vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQGU drawdown since its inception was -6.65%, smaller than the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQGU and AIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQGU | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -44.66% | +38.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.66% | -1.40% | -3.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.54% | -9.80% | +7.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.76% | — |
Volatility
GQGU vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GQGU | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.14% | 23.04% | -12.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.14% | 25.33% | -15.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.14% | 25.50% | -15.36% |
GQGU vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQGU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
GQGU vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison
GQGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than AIQ's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.14% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GQGU and AIQ have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.
GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.14% for AIQ.
GQGU is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AIQ is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: GQG Partners and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for GQGU and 0.68% for AIQ.
Find the right allocation for GQGU and AIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer