GPZ vs. PEX
GPZ (VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF) and PEX (ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - GPZ tracks the MarketVector Alternative Asset Managers Index while PEX tracks the LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GPZ returned -11.53% vs -14.73% for PEX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GPZ charges 0.40%/yr vs 3.13%/yr for PEX.
Performance
GPZ vs. PEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPZ achieves a -19.30% return, which is significantly lower than PEX's -13.80% return.
GPZ
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -19.30%
- 6M
- -20.44%
- 1Y
- -11.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEX
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- -13.80%
- 6M
- -12.61%
- 1Y
- -14.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.70%
- 5Y*
- -1.24%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
GPZ vs. PEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GPZ VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF | -19.30% | 9.24% |
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -13.80% | -0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPZ and PEX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.73 |
The correlation between GPZ and PEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
GPZ vs. PEX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GPZ
PEX
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
GPZ
PEX
Real Estate
GPZ
PEX
-
Basic Materials
GPZ
-
PEX
Communication Services
GPZ
-
PEX
-
Consumer Cyclical
GPZ
-
PEX
-
Consumer Defensive
GPZ
-
PEX
-
Energy
GPZ
-
PEX
-
Healthcare
GPZ
-
PEX
Industrials
GPZ
-
PEX
Technology
GPZ
-
PEX
-
Utilities
GPZ
-
PEX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPZ vs. PEX — Risk / Return Rank
GPZ
PEX
GPZ vs. PEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) and ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPZ | PEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.86 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | -0.60 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | -1.13 | +0.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPZ vs. PEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPZ drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, smaller than the maximum PEX drawdown of -49.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPZ and PEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPZ | PEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.72% | -49.17% | +17.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.72% | -24.72% | -7.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.87% | -22.09% | -3.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.27% | -8.26% | -4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.80% | 13.06% | +2.74% |
Volatility
GPZ vs. PEX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) has a higher volatility of 9.25% compared to ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) at 5.26%. This indicates that GPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPZ | PEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.25% | 5.26% | +3.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.33% | 13.47% | +8.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.85% | 15.93% | +11.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 17.99% | +9.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 19.30% | +8.30% |
GPZ vs. PEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PEX's 3.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
GPZ vs. PEX - Dividend Comparison
GPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than PEX's 13.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPZ VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF | 1.03% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 13.01% | 12.80% | 14.11% | 13.02% | 1.77% | 13.64% | 5.52% | 7.94% | 4.72% | 24.26% | 3.24% | 12.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPZ and PEX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPZ has higher volatility (9.25%) compared to PEX (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPZ dropped -31.72% vs PEX's -49.17%.
On 1-year performance, GPZ leads with -11.53% vs -14.73% for PEX. On fees, GPZ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, PEX has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GPZ has performed better with a -11.53% return vs -14.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GPZ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 3.13% for PEX.
PEX has the higher dividend yield at 13.01%, compared with 1.03% for GPZ.
GPZ tracks MarketVector Alternative Asset Managers Index, while PEX tracks LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GPZ and 3.13% for PEX.
GPZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.42 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPZ and PEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer