GPTY vs. LFGY
GPTY (YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) and LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GPTY returned 55.13% vs 9.18% for LFGY. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
GPTY vs. LFGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPTY achieves a 36.39% return, which is significantly higher than LFGY's 17.68% return.
GPTY
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 19.04%
- YTD
- 36.39%
- 6M
- 32.30%
- 1Y
- 55.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LFGY
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 9.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPTY vs. LFGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GPTY YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 36.39% | 17.15% |
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 17.68% | -12.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPTY and LFGY is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025 | 0.74 |
The correlation between GPTY and LFGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
GPTY vs. LFGY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GPTY
LFGY
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
GPTY
LFGY
Communication Services
GPTY
LFGY
Consumer Cyclical
GPTY
LFGY
Financial Services
GPTY
LFGY
Basic Materials
GPTY
-
LFGY
-
Consumer Defensive
GPTY
-
LFGY
-
Energy
GPTY
-
LFGY
-
Healthcare
GPTY
-
LFGY
-
Industrials
GPTY
-
LFGY
-
Real Estate
GPTY
-
LFGY
-
Utilities
GPTY
-
LFGY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPTY vs. LFGY — Risk / Return Rank
GPTY
LFGY
GPTY vs. LFGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPTY | LFGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.07 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 0.26 | +2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.65 | 0.56 | +7.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPTY | LFGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 0.25 | +2.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 0.14 | +1.30 |
Drawdowns
GPTY vs. LFGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPTY drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, smaller than the maximum LFGY drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTY and LFGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPTY | LFGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.62% | -35.94% | +9.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.32% | -35.94% | +16.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -10.11% | +8.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.52% | -14.07% | +7.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.23% | 16.42% | -9.19% |
Volatility
GPTY vs. LFGY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) is 7.41%, while YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) has a volatility of 10.56%. This indicates that GPTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPTY | LFGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.41% | 10.56% | -3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.19% | 30.09% | -11.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.95% | 37.15% | -13.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.85% | 41.96% | -13.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.85% | 41.96% | -13.11% |
GPTY vs. LFGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GPTY and LFGY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
GPTY vs. LFGY - Dividend Comparison
GPTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.54%, less than LFGY's 82.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GPTY YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 32.54% | 34.23% |
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 82.56% | 94.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPTY and LFGY have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFGY has higher volatility (10.56%) compared to GPTY (7.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPTY dropped -26.62% vs LFGY's -35.94%.
On 1-year performance, GPTY leads with 55.13% vs 9.18% for LFGY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GPTY has been the lower-risk option at 7.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GPTY has performed better with a 55.13% return vs 9.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GPTY and LFGY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 82.56%, compared with 32.54% for GPTY.
GPTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPTY and LFGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer