PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPTY vs. LFGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPTY vs. LFGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPTY achieves a 36.39% return, which is significantly higher than LFGY's 17.68% return.


GPTY

1D
-1.40%
1M
19.04%
YTD
36.39%
6M
32.30%
1Y
55.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LFGY

1D
-3.11%
1M
3.68%
YTD
17.68%
6M
8.51%
1Y
9.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPTY vs. LFGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GPTY and LFGY is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025

0.74

The correlation between GPTY and LFGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

GPTY vs. LFGY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GPTY
LFGY

Technology

77.9%
33.5%

Communication Services

10.4%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
4.1%

Financial Services

4.1%
55.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

GPTY
77.9%
LFGY
33.5%

Communication Services

GPTY
10.4%
LFGY
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

GPTY
7.6%
LFGY
4.1%

Financial Services

GPTY
4.1%
LFGY
55.9%

Basic Materials

GPTY

-

LFGY

-

Consumer Defensive

GPTY

-

LFGY

-

Energy

GPTY

-

LFGY

-

Healthcare

GPTY

-

LFGY

-

Industrials

GPTY

-

LFGY

-

Real Estate

GPTY

-

LFGY

-

Utilities

GPTY

-

LFGY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPTY vs. LFGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPTY
GPTY Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
GPTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPTY Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
GPTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPTY Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

LFGY
LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPTY vs. LFGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPTYLFGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.07

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

0.26

+2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.65

0.56

+7.09

GPTY vs. LFGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPTY Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the LFGY Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPTY and LFGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPTYLFGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

0.25

+2.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

0.14

+1.30

Drawdowns

GPTY vs. LFGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPTY drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, smaller than the maximum LFGY drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTY and LFGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPTYLFGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.62%

-35.94%

+9.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.32%

-35.94%

+16.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-10.11%

+8.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.52%

-14.07%

+7.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.23%

16.42%

-9.19%

Volatility

GPTY vs. LFGY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) is 7.41%, while YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) has a volatility of 10.56%. This indicates that GPTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPTYLFGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.41%

10.56%

-3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.19%

30.09%

-11.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.95%

37.15%

-13.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.85%

41.96%

-13.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.85%

41.96%

-13.11%

GPTY vs. LFGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GPTY and LFGY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

GPTY vs. LFGY - Dividend Comparison

GPTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.54%, less than LFGY's 82.56% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GPTY and LFGY have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFGY has higher volatility (10.56%) compared to GPTY (7.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPTY dropped -26.62% vs LFGY's -35.94%.

On 1-year performance, GPTY leads with 55.13% vs 9.18% for LFGY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GPTY has been the lower-risk option at 7.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GPTY has performed better with a 55.13% return vs 9.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GPTY and LFGY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 82.56%, compared with 32.54% for GPTY.

GPTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPTY and LFGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer