GPTY vs. MAGY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GPTY (YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) and MAGY (Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GPTY is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by YieldMax, while MAGY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GPTY returned 30.09% vs 1.42% for MAGY. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

GPTY vs. MAGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPTY achieves a 19.03% return, which is significantly higher than MAGY's -6.83% return.

GPTY

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: -3.52%
• 6M: 19.40%
• YTD: 19.03%
• 1Y: 30.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.94%

MAGY

• 1D: 2.29%
• 1M: 0.52%
• 6M: -7.69%
• YTD: -6.83%
• 1Y: 1.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GPTY YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	$1.83M	$1.93M	$2.58M
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF	$1.76M	$2.00M	$2.81M

GPTY vs. MAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GPTY YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	19.03%	49.05%
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF	-6.83%	26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between GPTY and MAGY is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	0.69

The correlation between GPTY and MAGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

GPTY vs. MAGY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GPTY	MAGY
Technology	76.4%	-
Communication Services	9.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	-
Financial Services	4.2%	100.0%
Industrials	2.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GPTY vs. MAGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GPTY

GPTY Risk / Return Rank: 38
GPTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
GPTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
GPTY Omega Ratio Rank: 38
GPTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
GPTY Martin Ratio Rank: 33

MAGY

MAGY Risk / Return Rank: 10
MAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
MAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
MAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 10
MAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GPTY vs. MAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GPTY	MAGY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	-0.05	+1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	0.04	+1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.01	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	-0.06	+1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.16	-0.16	+3.32

GPTY vs. MAGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the MAGY Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPTY and MAGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GPTY vs. MAGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPTY drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, which is greater than MAGY's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTY and MAGY.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPTY	MAGY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.62%	-14.29%	-12.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.32%	-14.29%	-5.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.94%	-8.86%	-5.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.85%	-3.41%	-3.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.35%	5.53%	+2.82%

Volatility

GPTY vs. MAGY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) has a higher volatility of 9.87% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) at 6.83%. This indicates that GPTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPTY	MAGY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.87%	6.83%	+3.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.61%	14.10%	+8.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.40%	16.87%	+10.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.87%	16.18%	+13.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.87%	16.18%	+13.69%

GPTY vs. MAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GPTY and MAGY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

GPTY vs. MAGY - Dividend Comparison

GPTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.00%, less than MAGY's 39.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
GPTY YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	39.00%	34.23%
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF	38.99%	23.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GPTY and MAGY in my portfolio?

GPTY and MAGY have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GPTY or MAGY?

GPTY has higher volatility (9.87%) compared to MAGY (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPTY dropped -26.62% vs MAGY's -14.29%.

Which ETF is better, GPTY or MAGY?

On 1-year performance, GPTY leads with 30.09% vs 1.42% for MAGY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, MAGY has been the lower-risk option at 6.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GPTY or MAGY?

Over the 1-year period, GPTY has performed better with a 30.09% return vs 1.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GPTY or MAGY?

GPTY and MAGY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GPTY or MAGY?

GPTY and MAGY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 39.00%.

What is the main difference between GPTY and MAGY?

GPTY is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while MAGY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.