PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPTY vs. AIPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPTY vs. AIPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) and REX AI Equity Premium Income ETF (AIPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPTY achieves a 38.32% return, which is significantly higher than AIPI's 11.58% return.


GPTY

1D
1.74%
1M
20.22%
YTD
38.32%
6M
36.02%
1Y
62.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIPI

1D
0.15%
1M
10.17%
YTD
11.58%
6M
11.05%
1Y
32.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPTY vs. AIPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GPTY and AIPI is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025

0.85

The correlation between GPTY and AIPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

GPTY vs. AIPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GPTY
AIPI

Technology

77.9%
90.9%

Communication Services

10.4%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
3.2%

Financial Services

4.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

GPTY
77.9%
AIPI
90.9%

Communication Services

GPTY
10.4%
AIPI
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GPTY
7.6%
AIPI
3.2%

Financial Services

GPTY
4.1%
AIPI

-

Basic Materials

GPTY

-

AIPI

-

Consumer Defensive

GPTY

-

AIPI

-

Energy

GPTY

-

AIPI

-

Healthcare

GPTY

-

AIPI

-

Industrials

GPTY

-

AIPI

-

Real Estate

GPTY

-

AIPI

-

Utilities

GPTY

-

AIPI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPTY vs. AIPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPTY
GPTY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GPTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPTY Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GPTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPTY Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

AIPI
AIPI Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
AIPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIPI Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
AIPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIPI Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPTY vs. AIPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) and REX AI Equity Premium Income ETF (AIPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPTYAIPIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.62

2.02

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.27

2.62

+0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.37

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

2.32

+0.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.83

7.22

+1.60

GPTY vs. AIPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPTY Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the AIPI Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPTY and AIPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPTYAIPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.02

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

1.06

+0.43

Drawdowns

GPTY vs. AIPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPTY drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, which is greater than AIPI's maximum drawdown of -25.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTY and AIPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPTYAIPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.62%

-25.25%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.32%

-14.40%

-4.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.54%

-4.67%

-1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.23%

4.63%

+2.60%

Volatility

GPTY vs. AIPI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to REX AI Equity Premium Income ETF (AIPI) at 2.59%. This indicates that GPTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPTYAIPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

2.59%

+4.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.12%

12.93%

+5.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.91%

15.94%

+7.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.86%

21.40%

+7.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.86%

21.40%

+7.46%

GPTY vs. AIPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPTY vs. AIPI - Dividend Comparison

GPTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.09%, less than AIPI's 33.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AIPI
REX AI Equity Premium Income ETF
33.63%37.84%18.13%
GPTY
YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
31.09%34.23%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPTY and AIPI have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPTY has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to AIPI (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPTY dropped -26.62% vs AIPI's -25.25%.

On 1-year performance, GPTY leads with 62.19% vs 32.04% for AIPI. On fees, AIPI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, AIPI has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GPTY has performed better with a 62.19% return vs 32.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIPI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GPTY.

AIPI has the higher dividend yield at 33.63%, compared with 31.09% for GPTY.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GPTY and 0.65% for AIPI.

GPTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPTY and AIPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer