PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPTY vs. AMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPTY vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPTY achieves a 19.07% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 97.19% return.


GPTY

1D
-3.10%
1M
-8.33%
6M
16.85%
YTD
19.07%
1Y
25.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDY

1D
-5.15%
1M
-0.14%
6M
92.76%
YTD
97.19%
1Y
156.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPTY vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GPTY and AMDY is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

0.68

The correlation between GPTY and AMDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPTY vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPTY
GPTY Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GPTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPTY Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GPTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDY
AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPTY vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GPTYAMDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.43

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

5.70

-4.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.30

12.64

-9.34

GPTY vs. AMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the AMDY Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPTY and AMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GPTY vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPTY drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTY and AMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPTYAMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.62%

-53.92%

+27.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.32%

-27.59%

+8.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.92%

-11.44%

-2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.63%

-17.49%

+10.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.77%

12.42%

-4.65%

Volatility

GPTY vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) is 8.79%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 17.85%. This indicates that GPTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPTYAMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.79%

17.85%

-9.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.74%

45.40%

-23.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.51%

57.53%

-31.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.74%

47.23%

-17.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.74%

47.23%

-17.49%

GPTY vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPTY vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

GPTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.37%, less than AMDY's 73.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
73.90%80.68%109.98%6.68%
GPTY
YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
39.37%34.23%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPTY and AMDY have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDY has higher volatility (17.85%) compared to GPTY (8.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPTY dropped -26.62% vs AMDY's -53.92%.

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 156.26% vs 25.58% for GPTY. On fees, GPTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, GPTY has been the lower-risk option at 8.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 156.26% return vs 25.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GPTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 73.90%, compared with 39.37% for GPTY.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and YieldMax ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GPTY and 1.23% for AMDY.

AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPTY and AMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer