GPRO vs. HL
GPRO (GoPro, Inc.) and HL (Hecla Mining Company) are both stocks. GPRO operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology), while HL operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, GPRO returned -20.77%/yr vs 14.62%/yr for HL. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GPRO vs. HL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPRO achieves a -25.89% return, which is significantly lower than HL's -13.10% return. Over the past 10 years, GPRO has underperformed HL with an annualized return of -20.77%, while HL has yielded a comparatively higher 14.62% annualized return.
GPRO
- 1D
- -8.73%
- 1M
- -27.43%
- YTD
- -25.89%
- 6M
- -43.51%
- 1Y
- 57.14%
- 3Y*
- -37.55%
- 5Y*
- -37.59%
- 10Y*
- -20.77%
HL
- 1D
- -6.35%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- -13.10%
- 6M
- -3.94%
- 1Y
- 189.25%
- 3Y*
- 45.57%
- 5Y*
- 13.86%
- 10Y*
- 14.62%
GPRO vs. HL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPRO GoPro, Inc. | -25.89% | 29.36% | -68.59% | -30.32% | -51.70% | 24.52% | 90.78% | 2.36% | -43.99% | -13.09% |
HL Hecla Mining Company | -13.10% | 291.70% | 2.82% | -12.93% | 6.99% | -18.97% | 91.83% | 44.43% | -40.37% | -24.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPRO and HL is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2014 | 0.20 |
The correlation between GPRO and HL shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GPRO:
$170.55M
HL:
$11.25B
GPRO:
-$0.80
HL:
$0.84
GPRO:
0.27
HL:
7.05
GPRO:
$616.30M
HL:
$1.57B
GPRO:
$180.32M
HL:
$788.95M
GPRO:
-$67.88M
HL:
$864.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPRO vs. HL — Risk / Return Rank
GPRO
HL
GPRO vs. HL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) and Hecla Mining Company (HL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPRO | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.37 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 3.92 | -3.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.25 | 8.20 | -6.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPRO | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 2.66 | -2.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.53 | 0.24 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.31 | 0.23 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.36 | 0.01 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
GPRO vs. HL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPRO drawdown since its inception was -99.49%, roughly equal to the maximum HL drawdown of -97.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPRO and HL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPRO | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.49% | -97.92% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.28% | -48.56% | -29.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.99% | -48.56% | -40.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.18% | -63.18% | -33.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.19% | -82.45% | -14.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.89% | -47.57% | -51.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.02% | -69.95% | -17.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.88% | 23.18% | +22.70% |
Volatility
GPRO vs. HL - Volatility Comparison
GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) has a higher volatility of 31.79% compared to Hecla Mining Company (HL) at 22.42%. This indicates that GPRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPRO | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.79% | 22.42% | +9.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.08% | 53.84% | +22.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 118.12% | 71.57% | +46.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.59% | 59.06% | +12.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.37% | 62.65% | +4.72% |
Dividends
GPRO vs. HL - Dividend Comparison
GPRO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPRO GoPro, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HL Hecla Mining Company | 0.09% | 0.08% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.25% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.53% |
Financials
GPRO vs. HL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GoPro, Inc. and Hecla Mining Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GPRO vs. HL - Profitability Comparison
GPRO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GoPro, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.31M and revenue of 99.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.4%.
HL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
GPRO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GoPro, Inc. reported an operating income of -57.25M and revenue of 99.07M, resulting in an operating margin of -57.8%.
HL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.
GPRO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GoPro, Inc. reported a net income of -80.82M and revenue of 99.07M, resulting in a net margin of -81.6%.
HL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GPRO and HL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPRO has higher volatility (31.79%) compared to HL (22.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPRO dropped -99.49% vs HL's -97.92%.
HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPRO and HL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer