GPRK vs. EC
GPRK (GeoPark Limited) and EC (Ecopetrol S.A.) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — GPRK in Oil & Gas E&P, EC in Oil & Gas Integrated. Over the past 10 years, GPRK returned 19.54%/yr vs 16.83%/yr for EC. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GPRK vs. EC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPRK achieves a 51.90% return, which is significantly lower than EC's 63.21% return. Over the past 10 years, GPRK has outperformed EC with an annualized return of 19.54%, while EC has yielded a comparatively lower 16.83% annualized return.
GPRK
- 1D
- -5.01%
- 1M
- 15.27%
- YTD
- 51.90%
- 6M
- 35.78%
- 1Y
- 61.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.00%
- 5Y*
- -2.50%
- 10Y*
- 19.54%
EC
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- 11.05%
- YTD
- 63.21%
- 6M
- 61.44%
- 1Y
- 100.00%
- 3Y*
- 40.47%
- 5Y*
- 21.16%
- 10Y*
- 16.83%
GPRK vs. EC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPRK GeoPark Limited | 51.90% | -14.55% | 15.15% | -41.47% | 38.97% | -10.99% | -40.46% | 60.28% | 39.46% | 129.93% |
EC Ecopetrol S.A. | 63.21% | 58.65% | -24.25% | 41.83% | -5.04% | 0.57% | -29.31% | 38.58% | 11.95% | 64.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPRK and EC is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2010 | 0.38 |
The correlation between GPRK and EC shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GPRK:
$622.18M
EC:
$32.03B
GPRK:
$1.07
EC:
$4.26K
GPRK:
10.43
EC:
0.00
GPRK:
1.23
EC:
0.00
GPRK:
2.13
EC:
0.00
GPRK:
$483.58M
EC:
$116.38T
GPRK:
$219.13M
EC:
$37.91T
GPRK:
$200.50M
EC:
$42.24T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPRK vs. EC — Risk / Return Rank
GPRK
EC
GPRK vs. EC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GeoPark Limited (GPRK) and Ecopetrol S.A. (EC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPRK | EC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 2.69 | -1.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.03 | 3.40 | -1.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.41 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 7.62 | -4.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.79 | 17.65 | -11.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPRK | EC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 2.69 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.56 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.41 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.15 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
GPRK vs. EC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPRK drawdown since its inception was -84.04%, smaller than the maximum EC drawdown of -90.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPRK and EC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPRK | EC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.04% | -90.16% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.26% | -13.20% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.81% | -38.00% | -9.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.67% | -48.60% | -13.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.52% | -73.36% | -0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.68% | -21.08% | -14.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.24% | -51.23% | +8.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.69% | 5.68% | +5.01% |
Volatility
GPRK vs. EC - Volatility Comparison
GeoPark Limited (GPRK) has a higher volatility of 18.39% compared to Ecopetrol S.A. (EC) at 17.04%. This indicates that GPRK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPRK | EC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.39% | 17.04% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.28% | 30.50% | +6.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.18% | 37.38% | +18.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.92% | 37.66% | +9.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.27% | 40.81% | +9.46% |
Dividends
GPRK vs. EC - Dividend Comparison
GPRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than EC's 7.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EC Ecopetrol S.A. | 7.58% | 20.77% | 20.47% | 22.02% | 22.47% | 0.72% | 6.92% | 9.87% | 4.01% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 14.83% |
GPRK GeoPark Limited | 2.06% | 6.36% | 6.22% | 6.14% | 2.71% | 1.07% | 0.48% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GPRK vs. EC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GeoPark Limited and Ecopetrol S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GPRK vs. EC - Profitability Comparison
GPRK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GeoPark Limited reported a gross profit of 61.90M and revenue of 128.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.
EC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ecopetrol S.A. reported a gross profit of 11.03T and revenue of 28.41T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.8%.
GPRK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GeoPark Limited reported an operating income of 45.30M and revenue of 128.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.3%.
EC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ecopetrol S.A. reported an operating income of 8.50T and revenue of 28.41T, resulting in an operating margin of 29.9%.
GPRK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GeoPark Limited reported a net income of 20.20M and revenue of 128.40M, resulting in a net margin of 15.7%.
EC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ecopetrol S.A. reported a net income of 2.87T and revenue of 28.41T, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GPRK and EC have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPRK has higher volatility (18.39%) compared to EC (17.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPRK dropped -84.04% vs EC's -90.16%.
EC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPRK and EC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer