PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPRK vs. GRNT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GPRK vs. GRNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GeoPark Limited (GPRK) and Granite Ridge Resources Inc (GRNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPRK achieves a 51.90% return, which is significantly higher than GRNT's 10.99% return.


GPRK

1D
-5.01%
1M
15.27%
YTD
51.90%
6M
35.78%
1Y
61.60%
3Y*
10.00%
5Y*
-2.50%
10Y*
19.54%

GRNT

1D
-0.40%
1M
-15.78%
YTD
10.99%
6M
-1.76%
1Y
-5.98%
3Y*
1.72%
5Y*
-7.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPRK vs. GRNT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GPRK
GeoPark Limited
51.90%-14.55%15.15%-41.47%38.97%-10.99%94.59%
GRNT
Granite Ridge Resources Inc
10.99%-21.29%14.92%-28.45%-7.12%-2.06%0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between GPRK and GRNT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020

0.28

The correlation between GPRK and GRNT shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GPRK:

$622.18M

GRNT:

$651.79M

EPS

GPRK:

$1.07

GRNT:

-$0.25

PS Ratio

GPRK:

1.23

GRNT:

1.99

PB Ratio

GPRK:

2.13

GRNT:

1.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

GPRK:

$483.58M

GRNT:

$327.38M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GPRK:

$219.13M

GRNT:

$64.03M

EBITDA (TTM)

GPRK:

$200.50M

GRNT:

$255.54M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPRK vs. GRNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPRK
GPRK Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GPRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPRK Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GPRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPRK Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

GRNT
GRNT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
GRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPRK vs. GRNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GeoPark Limited (GPRK) and Granite Ridge Resources Inc (GRNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPRKGRNTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.01

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

-0.18

+3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.79

-0.32

+6.11

GPRK vs. GRNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPRK Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is higher than the GRNT Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPRK and GRNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPRKGRNTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

-0.14

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

-0.19

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

-0.19

+0.23

Drawdowns

GPRK vs. GRNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPRK drawdown since its inception was -84.04%, which is greater than GRNT's maximum drawdown of -50.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPRK and GRNT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPRKGRNTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.04%

-50.26%

-33.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.26%

-34.14%

+12.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.81%

-37.11%

-10.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.67%

-49.87%

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.68%

-36.48%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.24%

-22.80%

-19.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.69%

18.45%

-7.76%

Volatility

GPRK vs. GRNT - Volatility Comparison

GeoPark Limited (GPRK) and Granite Ridge Resources Inc (GRNT) have volatilities of 18.39% and 18.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPRKGRNTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.39%

18.29%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.28%

32.82%

+4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.18%

41.62%

+14.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.92%

40.14%

+6.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.27%

38.20%

+12.07%

Dividends

GPRK vs. GRNT - Dividend Comparison

GPRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than GRNT's 8.82% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GPRK
GeoPark Limited
2.06%6.36%6.22%6.14%2.71%1.07%0.48%0.19%
GRNT
Granite Ridge Resources Inc
8.82%9.36%6.81%7.31%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GPRK vs. GRNT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GeoPark Limited and Granite Ridge Resources Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20222023202420252026
128.40M
0
(GPRK) Total Revenue
(GRNT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GPRK and GRNT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPRK has higher volatility (18.39%) compared to GRNT (18.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPRK dropped -84.04% vs GRNT's -50.26%.

GPRK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPRK and GRNT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer