GPRK vs. NOG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GeoPark Limited (GPRK) and Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG).

Performance

GPRK vs. NOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GeoPark Limited (GPRK) and Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GPRK vs. NOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GPRK GeoPark Limited	28.67%	-14.55%	15.15%	-41.47%	38.97%	-10.99%	-40.46%	60.28%	39.46%	129.93%
NOG Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.	38.16%	-38.20%	4.84%	25.54%	54.51%	136.72%	-62.56%	3.54%	10.24%	-25.45%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GPRK : $491.03M NOG : $2.90B
EPS GPRK : $0.70 NOG : $0.39
PE Ratio GPRK : 13.51 NOG : 74.36
PS Ratio GPRK : 1.39 NOG : 1.28
PB Ratio GPRK : 2.00 NOG : 1.37
Total Revenue (TTM) GPRK : $355.18M NOG : $2.25B
Gross Profit (TTM) GPRK : $157.23M NOG : $579.25M
EBITDA (TTM) GPRK : $155.20M NOG : $967.71M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPRK achieves a 28.67% return, which is significantly lower than NOG's 38.16% return. Over the past 10 years, GPRK has outperformed NOG with an annualized return of 15.35%, while NOG has yielded a comparatively lower -0.59% annualized return.

GPRK

• 1D: -2.16%
• 1M: 14.73%
• YTD: 28.67%
• 6M: 50.25%
• 1Y: 23.82%
• 3Y*: -0.15%
• 5Y*: -6.62%
• 10Y*: 15.35%

NOG

• 1D: -2.27%
• 1M: 7.51%
• YTD: 38.16%
• 6M: 22.12%
• 1Y: 3.42%
• 3Y*: 4.10%
• 5Y*: 22.34%
• 10Y*: -0.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GPRK vs. NOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPRK

GPRK Risk / Return Rank: 58
GPRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
GPRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
GPRK Omega Ratio Rank: 53
GPRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
GPRK Martin Ratio Rank: 61

NOG

NOG Risk / Return Rank: 43
NOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
NOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
NOG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
NOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
NOG Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPRK vs. NOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GeoPark Limited (GPRK) and Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GPRK	NOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	0.06	+0.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	0.47	+0.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.06	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.93	0.11	+0.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.95	0.18	+1.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GPRK vs. NOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPRK Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is higher than the NOG Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPRK and NOG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GPRK	NOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43	0.06	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.15	0.45	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	-0.01	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	-0.01	+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between GPRK and NOG is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GPRK vs. NOG - Dividend Comparison

GPRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than NOG's 6.16% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GPRK GeoPark Limited	3.73%	6.36%	6.22%	6.14%	2.71%	1.07%	0.48%	0.19%
NOG Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.	6.16%	8.38%	4.41%	4.02%	2.86%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GPRK vs. NOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPRK drawdown since its inception was -84.04%, smaller than the maximum NOG drawdown of -98.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPRK and NOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPRK	NOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.04%	-98.96%	+14.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.63%	-34.26%	+6.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.67%	-51.36%	-10.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.52%	-94.08%	+20.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.52%	-88.99%	+43.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.21%	-69.53%	+27.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.24%	20.33%	-7.09%

Volatility

GPRK vs. NOG - Volatility Comparison

GeoPark Limited (GPRK) has a higher volatility of 14.95% compared to Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) at 8.86%. This indicates that GPRK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPRK	NOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.95%	8.86%	+6.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.74%	30.71%	+8.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.03%	54.02%	+2.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.82%	49.78%	-3.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.13%	70.87%	-19.74%

Financials

GPRK vs. NOG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GeoPark Limited and Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GPRK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GeoPark Limited reported a gross profit of 40.20M and revenue of 110.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.5%.

NOG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 610.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GPRK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GeoPark Limited reported an operating income of 19.20M and revenue of 110.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

NOG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. reported an operating income of -33.84M and revenue of 610.18M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.6%.

GPRK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GeoPark Limited reported a net income of 31.10M and revenue of 110.30M, resulting in a net margin of 28.2%.

NOG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. reported a net income of -70.73M and revenue of 610.18M, resulting in a net margin of -11.6%.