GPRK vs. SD
GPRK (GeoPark Limited) and SD (SandRidge Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas E&P industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 5 years, GPRK returned 0.66%/yr vs 27.07%/yr for SD. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GPRK vs. SD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPRK achieves a 32.35% return, which is significantly higher than SD's -0.78% return.
GPRK
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 7.50%
- 6M
- 15.65%
- YTD
- 32.35%
- 1Y
- 57.56%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- 0.66%
- 10Y*
- 14.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.23%
SD
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- 6M
- -9.67%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 1Y
- 45.96%
- 3Y*
- 0.83%
- 5Y*
- 27.07%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
GPRK GeoPark Limited | $3.75M | $3.64M | $5.42M |
| $3.52M | $3.68M | $4.81M |
GPRK vs. SD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPRK GeoPark Limited | 32.35% | -14.55% | 15.15% | -41.47% | 38.97% | -10.99% | -40.46% | 60.28% | 39.46% | 129.93% |
SD SandRidge Energy, Inc. | -0.78% | 28.18% | -0.35% | -8.19% | 62.81% | 237.42% | -26.89% | -44.28% | -63.88% | -10.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPRK and SD is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2016 | 0.42 |
Fundamentals
GPRK:
$511.62M
SD:
$513.90M
GPRK:
$1.06
SD:
$2.05
GPRK:
9.16
SD:
6.78
GPRK:
0.21
SD:
0.59
GPRK:
1.08
SD:
3.14
GPRK:
1.85
SD:
0.98
GPRK:
$483.58M
SD:
$163.53M
GPRK:
$219.13M
SD:
$48.88M
GPRK:
$200.50M
SD:
$91.86M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPRK vs. SD — Risk / Return Rank
GPRK
SD
GPRK vs. SD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GeoPark Limited (GPRK) and SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPRK | SD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.19 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 1.60 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.97 | 3.64 | +2.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPRK vs. SD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPRK drawdown since its inception was -84.04%, smaller than the maximum SD drawdown of -97.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPRK and SD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPRK | SD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.04% | -97.03% | +12.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.17% | -25.37% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.81% | -37.87% | -9.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.67% | -57.05% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.96% | -30.13% | -13.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.24% | -50.62% | +8.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.47% | 11.16% | -1.69% |
Volatility
GPRK vs. SD - Volatility Comparison
GeoPark Limited (GPRK) has a higher volatility of 12.68% compared to SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) at 8.18%. This indicates that GPRK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPRK | SD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.68% | 8.18% | +4.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.49% | 26.25% | +12.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.86% | 36.49% | +19.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.00% | 47.87% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.04% | 66.03% | -15.99% |
Dividends
GPRK vs. SD - Dividend Comparison
GPRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, less than SD's 4.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPRK GeoPark Limited | 2.36% | 6.36% | 6.22% | 6.14% | 2.71% | 1.07% | 0.48% | 0.19% |
SD SandRidge Energy, Inc. | 4.96% | 3.19% | 17.51% | 16.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GPRK vs. SD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GeoPark Limited and SandRidge Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GPRK vs. SD - Profitability Comparison
GPRK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GeoPark Limited reported a gross profit of 61.90M and revenue of 128.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.
SD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SandRidge Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 49.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GPRK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GeoPark Limited reported an operating income of 45.30M and revenue of 128.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.3%.
SD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SandRidge Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.86M and revenue of 49.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.9%.
GPRK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GeoPark Limited reported a net income of 20.20M and revenue of 128.40M, resulting in a net margin of 15.7%.
SD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SandRidge Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 18.67M and revenue of 49.78M, resulting in a net margin of 37.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GPRK and SD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPRK has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to SD (8.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPRK dropped -84.04% vs SD's -97.03%.
SD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPRK and SD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer