GPIX vs. SCHG
GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GPIX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. GPIX is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past year, GPIX returned 22.98% vs 20.82% for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GPIX charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
GPIX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPIX achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 3.75% return.
GPIX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 22.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- 20.82%
- 3Y*
- 24.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- 18.53%
GPIX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 8.17% | 16.25% | 21.77% | 13.45% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 3.75% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 18.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPIX and SCHG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between GPIX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
GPIX vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GPIX
SCHG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
GPIX
SCHG
Financial Services
GPIX
SCHG
Communication Services
GPIX
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
GPIX
SCHG
Healthcare
GPIX
SCHG
Industrials
GPIX
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
GPIX
SCHG
Energy
GPIX
SCHG
Utilities
GPIX
SCHG
Real Estate
GPIX
SCHG
Basic Materials
GPIX
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPIX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
GPIX
SCHG
GPIX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.24 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 1.27 | +1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.96 | 4.25 | +10.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 1.33 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.71 | 0.83 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
GPIX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPIX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIX and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.50% | -34.59% | +17.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.71% | -16.41% | +8.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.06% | -4.25% | +2.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -5.20% | +3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 4.91% | -3.37% |
Volatility
GPIX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) is 3.07%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that GPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 4.52% | -1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | 12.02% | -3.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.40% | 15.77% | -5.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 22.31% | -8.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 21.58% | -7.74% |
GPIX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPIX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
GPIX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
GPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, more than SCHG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 8.13% | 8.01% | 7.45% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, GPIX and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHG has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to GPIX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIX dropped -17.50% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 22.98% vs 20.82% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 22.98% return vs 20.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIX.
GPIX has the higher dividend yield at 8.13%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.
GPIX is categorized as Derivative Income, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GPIX and 0.04% for SCHG.
GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPIX and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer