GPIQ vs. GPI
GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while GPI (Group 1 Automotive, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, GPIQ returned 37.50% vs -28.40% for GPI. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GPIQ vs. GPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPIQ achieves a 18.30% return, which is significantly higher than GPI's -21.99% return.
GPIQ
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 8.51%
- YTD
- 18.30%
- 6M
- 17.64%
- 1Y
- 37.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPI
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- -21.99%
- 6M
- -25.24%
- 1Y
- -28.40%
- 3Y*
- 10.01%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- 18.77%
GPIQ vs. GPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 18.30% | 19.77% | 23.22% | 15.38% |
GPI Group 1 Automotive, Inc. | -21.99% | -6.26% | 39.10% | 22.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPIQ and GPI is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPIQ vs. GPI — Risk / Return Rank
GPIQ
GPI
GPIQ vs. GPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and Group 1 Automotive, Inc. (GPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPIQ | GPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 0.86 | +0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | -0.73 | +4.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.48 | -1.31 | +18.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPIQ | GPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | -0.87 | +3.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.78 | 0.26 | +1.53 |
Drawdowns
GPIQ vs. GPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPIQ drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, smaller than the maximum GPI drawdown of -90.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIQ and GPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPIQ | GPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.06% | -90.68% | +69.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.51% | -38.91% | +29.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -37.08% | +36.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -27.18% | +24.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 21.64% | -19.49% |
Volatility
GPIQ vs. GPI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) is 3.39%, while Group 1 Automotive, Inc. (GPI) has a volatility of 12.00%. This indicates that GPIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPIQ | GPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 12.00% | -8.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.44% | 22.70% | -12.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.40% | 32.91% | -19.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 37.34% | -19.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 44.60% | -27.13% |
Dividends
GPIQ vs. GPI - Dividend Comparison
GPIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.32%, more than GPI's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPI Group 1 Automotive, Inc. | 0.69% | 0.51% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.83% | 0.68% | 0.46% | 1.09% | 1.97% | 1.37% | 1.17% | 1.10% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 9.32% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPIQ and GPI have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPI has higher volatility (12.00%) compared to GPIQ (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIQ dropped -21.06% vs GPI's -90.68%.
GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPIQ and GPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer