GPI vs. ABG
GPI (Group 1 Automotive, Inc.) and ABG (Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Auto & Truck Dealerships industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, GPI returned 18.03%/yr vs 15.28%/yr for ABG. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
GPI vs. ABG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPI achieves a -26.84% return, which is significantly lower than ABG's -0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, GPI has outperformed ABG with an annualized return of 18.03%, while ABG has yielded a comparatively lower 15.28% annualized return.
GPI
- 1D
- -3.35%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- 6M
- -18.77%
- YTD
- -26.84%
- 1Y
- -29.69%
- 3Y*
- 3.74%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- 18.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.32%
ABG
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 12.80%
- 6M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- 0.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $73.30M | $60.04M | $54.50M | |
| $75.59M | $65.15M | $62.98M |
GPI vs. ABG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPI Group 1 Automotive, Inc. | -26.84% | -6.26% | 39.10% | 70.18% | -6.85% | 50.05% | 31.93% | 92.36% | -24.57% | -7.63% |
ABG Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. | -0.36% | -4.32% | 8.03% | 25.51% | 3.77% | 18.52% | 30.37% | 67.70% | 4.16% | 3.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPI and ABG is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2002 | 0.67 |
The correlation between GPI and ABG shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GPI:
$3.41B
ABG:
$4.31B
GPI:
$23.87
ABG:
$14.28
GPI:
12.02
ABG:
16.22
GPI:
35.31
ABG:
2.77
GPI:
0.16
ABG:
0.35
GPI:
$22.15B
ABG:
$9.61B
GPI:
$3.47B
ABG:
$1.60B
GPI:
$778.30M
ABG:
$790.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPI vs. ABG — Risk / Return Rank
GPI
ABG
GPI vs. ABG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Group 1 Automotive, Inc. (GPI) and Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPI | ABG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.05 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 0.14 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.17 | 0.27 | -1.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPI vs. ABG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPI drawdown since its inception was -90.68%, roughly equal to the maximum ABG drawdown of -92.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPI and ABG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPI | ABG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.68% | -92.76% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.03% | -31.94% | -9.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.03% | -42.37% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.03% | -42.37% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.25% | -65.68% | -4.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.99% | -24.25% | -16.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.22% | -26.32% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.61% | 16.04% | +9.57% |
Volatility
GPI vs. ABG - Volatility Comparison
Group 1 Automotive, Inc. (GPI) has a higher volatility of 23.80% compared to Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) at 13.69%. This indicates that GPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPI | ABG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.80% | 13.69% | +10.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.21% | 24.91% | +7.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.74% | 32.73% | +5.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.94% | 40.04% | -2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.92% | 41.49% | +3.43% |
Dividends
GPI vs. ABG - Dividend Comparison
GPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while ABG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABG Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GPI Group 1 Automotive, Inc. | 0.73% | 0.51% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.83% | 0.68% | 0.46% | 1.09% | 1.97% | 1.37% | 1.17% | 1.10% |
Financials
GPI vs. ABG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Group 1 Automotive, Inc. and Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GPI vs. ABG - Profitability Comparison
GPI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Group 1 Automotive, Inc. reported a gross profit of 860.60M and revenue of 5.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.0%.
ABG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of -726.80M and revenue of -3.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.3%.
GPI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Group 1 Automotive, Inc. reported an operating income of 203.10M and revenue of 5.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.
ABG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 203.70M and revenue of -3.98B, resulting in an operating margin of -5.1%.
GPI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Group 1 Automotive, Inc. reported a net income of 103.30M and revenue of 5.39B, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.
ABG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. reported a net income of -187.80M and revenue of -3.98B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GPI and ABG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPI has higher volatility (23.80%) compared to ABG (13.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPI dropped -90.68% vs ABG's -92.76%.
ABG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPI and ABG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer