GPIQ vs. GEM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) and GEM (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while GEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index. GPIQ is actively managed, while GEM is passively managed. Over the past year, GPIQ returned 37.50% vs 54.83% for GEM. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GPIQ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GEM.

Performance

GPIQ vs. GEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIQ achieves a 18.30% return, which is significantly lower than GEM's 27.56% return.

GPIQ

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 8.51%
• YTD: 18.30%
• 6M: 17.64%
• 1Y: 37.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GEM

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 9.44%
• YTD: 27.56%
• 6M: 30.41%
• 1Y: 54.83%
• 3Y*: 23.85%
• 5Y*: 7.91%
• 10Y*: 10.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPIQ vs. GEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	18.30%	19.77%	23.22%	15.38%
GEM Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF	27.56%	33.43%	6.66%	11.52%

Correlation

The correlation between GPIQ and GEM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023	0.64

The correlation between GPIQ and GEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GPIQ vs. GEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GPIQ	GEM
Technology	53.8%	14.1%
Communication Services	15.8%	4.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	13.0%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	4.2%
Healthcare	4.2%	5.4%
Industrials	2.9%	7.5%
Utilities	1.4%	4.3%
Basic Materials	1.1%	8.7%
Energy	0.6%	1.3%
Financial Services	0.2%	34.0%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.5%

Return for Risk

GPIQ vs. GEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIQ

GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 81
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 82
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 83

GEM

GEM Risk / Return Rank: 82
GEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
GEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
GEM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
GEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
GEM Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIQ vs. GEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GPIQ	GEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.81	2.82	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	3.68	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.51	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.96	4.08	-0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.48	15.81	+1.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GPIQ vs. GEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the GEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIQ and GEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GPIQ	GEM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.81	2.82	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.78	0.53	+1.26

Drawdowns

GPIQ vs. GEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIQ drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, smaller than the maximum GEM drawdown of -37.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIQ and GEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPIQ	GEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.06%	-37.02%	+15.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.51%	-13.50%	+3.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.54%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.43%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-1.04%	+0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-12.01%	+9.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	3.48%	-1.33%

Volatility

GPIQ vs. GEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) is 3.39%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) has a volatility of 8.60%. This indicates that GPIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPIQ	GEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.39%	8.60%	-5.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.44%	16.96%	-6.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.40%	19.51%	-6.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.47%	17.70%	-0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.47%	19.03%	-1.56%

GPIQ vs. GEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than GEM's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

GPIQ vs. GEM - Dividend Comparison

GPIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.32%, more than GEM's 1.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GEM Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.80%	2.30%	2.58%	2.97%	2.96%	3.00%	1.63%	3.13%	2.08%	1.81%	1.98%	0.25%
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	9.32%	9.81%	9.18%	1.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GPIQ and GEM in my portfolio?

GPIQ and GEM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GPIQ or GEM?

GEM has higher volatility (8.60%) compared to GPIQ (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIQ dropped -21.06% vs GEM's -37.02%.

Which ETF is better, GPIQ or GEM?

On 1-year performance, GEM leads with 54.83% vs 37.50% for GPIQ. On fees, GPIQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GPIQ or GEM?

Over the 1-year period, GEM has performed better with a 54.83% return vs 37.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GPIQ or GEM?

GPIQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GPIQ or GEM?

GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.32%, compared with 1.80% for GEM.

What is the main difference between GPIQ and GEM?

GPIQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while GEM is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GPIQ and 0.45% for GEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.