GEM vs. SPEM
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM).
GEM and SPEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GEM is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index. It was launched on Sep 29, 2015. SPEM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets BMI. It was launched on Mar 19, 2007. Both GEM and SPEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GEM or SPEM.
Correlation
The correlation between GEM and SPEM is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GEM vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GEM:
0.88
SPEM:
1.19
GEM:
1.31
SPEM:
1.72
GEM:
1.16
SPEM:
1.22
GEM:
0.61
SPEM:
0.94
GEM:
2.66
SPEM:
3.60
GEM:
4.87%
SPEM:
4.77%
GEM:
14.84%
SPEM:
14.52%
GEM:
-37.02%
SPEM:
-64.41%
GEM:
-9.92%
SPEM:
-4.27%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEM achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly higher than SPEM's 5.16% return.
GEM
6.11%
4.60%
3.56%
11.73%
3.02%
N/A
SPEM
5.16%
4.53%
5.62%
15.90%
4.94%
4.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GEM vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GEM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEM's 0.11% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GEM vs. SPEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GEM
SPEM
GEM vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GEM vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison
GEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, less than SPEM's 2.64% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEM Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.43% | 2.58% | 2.97% | 2.96% | 3.00% | 1.47% | 3.13% | 2.08% | 1.81% | 1.98% | 0.25% | 0.00% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 2.64% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 1.92% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.51% | 2.40% | 2.26% |
Drawdowns
GEM vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEM drawdown since its inception was -37.02%, smaller than the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEM and SPEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GEM vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) at 3.44%. This indicates that GEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.