GEM vs. SCHE
GEM (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and SCHE (Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - GEM tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index while SCHE tracks the FTSE Emerging Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GEM returned 10.51%/yr vs 9.30%/yr for SCHE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GEM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for SCHE.
Performance
GEM vs. SCHE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEM achieves a 29.96% return, which is significantly higher than SCHE's 13.71% return. Over the past 10 years, GEM has outperformed SCHE with an annualized return of 10.51%, while SCHE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.30% annualized return.
GEM
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 8.42%
- YTD
- 29.96%
- 6M
- 31.86%
- 1Y
- 54.83%
- 3Y*
- 24.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
SCHE
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 4.17%
- YTD
- 13.71%
- 6M
- 14.37%
- 1Y
- 31.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.30%
GEM vs. SCHE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEM Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 29.96% | 33.43% | 6.66% | 11.82% | -21.33% | -0.19% | 13.23% | 17.79% | -14.25% | 36.43% |
SCHE Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 13.71% | 26.54% | 10.60% | 8.93% | -17.84% | -0.65% | 14.49% | 20.31% | -13.57% | 32.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEM and SCHE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2015 | 0.96 |
The correlation between GEM and SCHE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
GEM vs. SCHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GEM
SCHE
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
GEM
SCHE
Financial Services
GEM
SCHE
Consumer Cyclical
GEM
SCHE
Communication Services
GEM
SCHE
Basic Materials
GEM
SCHE
Industrials
GEM
SCHE
Energy
GEM
SCHE
Healthcare
GEM
SCHE
Consumer Defensive
GEM
SCHE
Utilities
GEM
SCHE
Real Estate
GEM
SCHE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEM vs. SCHE — Risk / Return Rank
GEM
SCHE
GEM vs. SCHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GEM | SCHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.35 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 2.84 | +1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.13 | 10.03 | +5.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GEM vs. SCHE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEM drawdown since its inception was -37.02%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHE drawdown of -36.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEM and SCHE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEM | SCHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.02% | -36.20% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.50% | -11.29% | -2.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.54% | -17.08% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.10% | -33.31% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.02% | -36.20% | -0.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.97% | -12.57% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 3.19% | +0.45% |
Volatility
GEM vs. SCHE - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) has a higher volatility of 10.70% compared to Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) at 6.77%. This indicates that GEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEM | SCHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.70% | 6.77% | +3.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.31% | 14.69% | +4.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.48% | 17.09% | +4.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 17.84% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 19.50% | -0.28% |
GEM vs. SCHE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GEM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHE's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
GEM vs. SCHE - Dividend Comparison
GEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than SCHE's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEM Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.77% | 2.30% | 2.58% | 2.97% | 2.96% | 3.00% | 1.63% | 3.13% | 2.08% | 1.81% | 1.98% | 0.25% |
SCHE Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.53% | 2.88% | 3.03% | 3.83% | 2.88% | 2.86% | 2.09% | 3.27% | 2.64% | 2.31% | 2.27% | 2.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, GEM and SCHE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GEM has higher volatility (10.70%) compared to SCHE (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEM dropped -37.02% vs SCHE's -36.20%.
On 10-year performance, GEM leads with 10.51% vs 9.30% for SCHE. On fees, SCHE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SCHE has been the lower-risk option at 6.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GEM has performed better with a 10.51% return vs 9.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GEM.
SCHE has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 1.77% for GEM.
GEM tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index, while SCHE tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GEM and 0.11% for SCHE.
GEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GEM and SCHE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer