PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPGCX vs. SMCWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPGCX vs. SMCWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund (GPGCX) and American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPGCX achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly higher than SMCWX's 9.99% return.


GPGCX

1D
1.63%
1M
2.47%
6M
7.29%
YTD
12.31%
1Y
22.40%
3Y*
17.67%
5Y*
10.35%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.18%

SMCWX

1D
2.71%
1M
-4.41%
6M
6.23%
YTD
9.99%
1Y
18.05%
3Y*
9.61%
5Y*
1.16%
10Y*
9.35%
ALL TIME*
9.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GPGCX vs. SMCWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GPGCX
Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund
12.31%20.03%14.97%21.28%-14.60%20.00%24.99%9.60%
SMCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A
9.99%14.07%2.33%18.86%-29.90%10.14%37.46%8.98%

Correlation

The correlation between GPGCX and SMCWX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2019

0.77

The correlation between GPGCX and SMCWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPGCX vs. SMCWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GPGCX
GPGCX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
GPGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GPGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

SMCWX
SMCWX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SMCWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCWX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCWX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GPGCX vs. SMCWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund (GPGCX) and American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GPGCXSMCWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.17

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

1.36

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.52

4.93

+0.60

GPGCX vs. SMCWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPGCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the SMCWX Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPGCX and SMCWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GPGCX vs. SMCWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPGCX drawdown since its inception was -37.17%, smaller than the maximum SMCWX drawdown of -62.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPGCX and SMCWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPGCXSMCWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.17%

-62.46%

+25.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.17%

-11.83%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.46%

-21.40%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.70%

-39.79%

+14.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.28%

+6.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.15%

-14.86%

+8.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

3.26%

+0.61%

Volatility

GPGCX vs. SMCWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund (GPGCX) is 4.13%, while American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that GPGCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMCWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPGCXSMCWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

5.86%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

14.97%

-3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.51%

17.64%

-3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

18.53%

-4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.12%

17.94%

-1.82%

GPGCX vs. SMCWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPGCX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SMCWX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPGCX vs. SMCWX - Dividend Comparison

GPGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.94%, more than SMCWX's 4.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPGCX
Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund
13.94%15.65%7.19%1.92%2.98%5.88%1.70%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A
4.37%4.84%0.60%0.64%0.00%9.24%1.60%4.24%7.06%4.48%0.35%6.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPGCX and SMCWX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMCWX has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to GPGCX (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPGCX dropped -37.17% vs SMCWX's -62.46%.

GPGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPGCX and SMCWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer