PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPGCX vs. GPROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPGCX vs. GPROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund (GPGCX) and Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund (GPROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPGCX achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly higher than GPROX's 6.75% return.


GPGCX

1D
-1.10%
1M
2.63%
YTD
7.69%
6M
12.41%
1Y
20.42%
3Y*
19.35%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*

GPROX

1D
-0.94%
1M
1.66%
YTD
6.75%
6M
8.90%
1Y
11.17%
3Y*
10.70%
5Y*
-0.61%
10Y*
8.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPGCX vs. GPROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GPGCX
Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund
7.69%20.03%14.97%21.28%-14.60%20.00%24.99%9.60%
GPROX
Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund
6.75%8.87%5.51%14.86%-34.54%19.78%41.16%10.18%

Correlation

The correlation between GPGCX and GPROX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2019

0.87

The correlation between GPGCX and GPROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPGCX vs. GPROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPGCX
GPGCX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GPGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GPGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

GPROX
GPROX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GPROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPROX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
GPROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPROX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPGCX vs. GPROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund (GPGCX) and Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund (GPROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPGCXGPROXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

0.82

+0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.20

1.31

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.16

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

0.91

+0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.25

3.10

+2.15

GPGCX vs. GPROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPGCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the GPROX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPGCX and GPROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPGCXGPROXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

0.82

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

-0.03

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.49

+0.43

Drawdowns

GPGCX vs. GPROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPGCX drawdown since its inception was -37.17%, smaller than the maximum GPROX drawdown of -43.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPGCX and GPROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPGCXGPROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.17%

-43.86%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.17%

-12.29%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.46%

-17.51%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.70%

-43.86%

+18.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-12.18%

+11.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-12.98%

+6.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

3.60%

+0.25%

Volatility

GPGCX vs. GPROX - Volatility Comparison

Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund (GPGCX) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund (GPROX) at 3.72%. This indicates that GPGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPGCXGPROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

3.72%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.19%

11.45%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.11%

13.98%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.41%

17.89%

-3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.18%

17.10%

-0.92%

GPGCX vs. GPROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPGCX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GPROX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPGCX vs. GPROX - Dividend Comparison

GPGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.54%, less than GPROX's 18.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPGCX
Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund
14.54%15.65%7.19%1.92%2.98%5.88%1.70%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GPROX
Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund
18.44%19.69%12.03%0.14%0.00%15.32%8.09%2.58%11.25%1.49%0.13%3.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, GPGCX and GPROX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GPGCX has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to GPROX (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPGCX dropped -37.17% vs GPROX's -43.86%.

GPGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPGCX and GPROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer