PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMCWX vs. FWWFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMCWX vs. FWWFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) and Fidelity Worldwide Fund (FWWFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCWX achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly lower than FWWFX's 19.48% return. Over the past 10 years, SMCWX has underperformed FWWFX with an annualized return of 9.89%, while FWWFX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.95% annualized return.


SMCWX

1D
-0.69%
1M
1.94%
YTD
12.08%
6M
13.47%
1Y
25.50%
3Y*
12.68%
5Y*
1.90%
10Y*
9.89%

FWWFX

1D
0.18%
1M
6.48%
YTD
19.48%
6M
19.57%
1Y
40.23%
3Y*
25.03%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
14.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCWX vs. FWWFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A
12.08%14.07%2.33%18.86%-29.90%10.14%37.46%30.79%-9.75%26.85%
FWWFX
Fidelity Worldwide Fund
19.48%16.16%27.65%24.96%-25.74%18.49%30.91%28.97%-4.53%28.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCWX and FWWFX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 1990

0.86

The correlation between SMCWX and FWWFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMCWX vs. FWWFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCWX
SMCWX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SMCWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCWX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCWX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FWWFX
FWWFX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FWWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FWWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCWX vs. FWWFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) and Fidelity Worldwide Fund (FWWFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMCWXFWWFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.66

2.37

-0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.41

3.15

-0.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.42

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

3.50

-1.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.81

15.18

-6.37

SMCWX vs. FWWFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the FWWFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCWX and FWWFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMCWXFWWFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.37

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.65

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.80

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.55

+0.03

Drawdowns

SMCWX vs. FWWFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCWX drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, which is greater than FWWFX's maximum drawdown of -56.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCWX and FWWFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMCWXFWWFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.46%

-56.54%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-11.74%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-22.61%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.79%

-33.72%

-6.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.79%

-33.72%

-6.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-0.14%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.92%

-9.43%

-5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.71%

+0.24%

Volatility

SMCWX vs. FWWFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) is 5.06%, while Fidelity Worldwide Fund (FWWFX) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that SMCWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWWFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMCWXFWWFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

5.97%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.85%

13.70%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.84%

17.40%

-1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

18.88%

-0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.89%

18.79%

-0.90%

SMCWX vs. FWWFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCWX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than FWWFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMCWX vs. FWWFX - Dividend Comparison

SMCWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than FWWFX's 9.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FWWFX
Fidelity Worldwide Fund
9.66%11.54%14.64%0.94%6.29%12.76%8.08%4.87%9.63%6.24%1.22%3.38%
SMCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A
4.32%4.84%0.60%0.64%0.00%9.24%1.60%4.24%7.06%4.48%0.35%6.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMCWX and FWWFX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FWWFX has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to SMCWX (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCWX dropped -62.46% vs FWWFX's -56.54%.

FWWFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMCWX and FWWFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer