PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPGCX vs. SFCWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPGCX vs. SFCWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund (GPGCX) and American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3 (SFCWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPGCX achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than SFCWX's 12.98% return.


GPGCX

1D
-0.28%
1M
2.46%
YTD
7.39%
6M
11.01%
1Y
19.60%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*

SFCWX

1D
0.64%
1M
2.84%
YTD
12.98%
6M
13.60%
1Y
26.05%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
2.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPGCX vs. SFCWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GPGCX
Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund
7.39%20.03%14.97%21.28%-14.60%20.00%24.99%9.60%
SFCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3
12.98%14.49%2.72%19.34%-29.65%10.54%37.95%8.83%

Correlation

The correlation between GPGCX and SFCWX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2019

0.78

The correlation between GPGCX and SFCWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPGCX vs. SFCWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPGCX
GPGCX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GPGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
GPGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SFCWX
SFCWX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SFCWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFCWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFCWX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SFCWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFCWX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPGCX vs. SFCWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund (GPGCX) and American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3 (SFCWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPGCXSFCWXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

1.70

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

2.47

-0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

2.28

-0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.23

9.12

-3.89

GPGCX vs. SFCWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPGCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the SFCWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPGCX and SFCWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPGCXSFCWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.70

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.14

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.51

+0.40

Drawdowns

GPGCX vs. SFCWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPGCX drawdown since its inception was -37.17%, smaller than the maximum SFCWX drawdown of -39.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPGCX and SFCWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPGCXSFCWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.17%

-39.54%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.17%

-11.81%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.46%

-21.30%

+4.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.70%

-39.54%

+13.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-0.48%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-12.45%

+6.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

2.94%

+0.91%

Volatility

GPGCX vs. SFCWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund (GPGCX) is 4.15%, while American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3 (SFCWX) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that GPGCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFCWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPGCXSFCWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

5.09%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.15%

12.83%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.08%

15.82%

-1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.42%

18.19%

-3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.18%

18.51%

-2.33%

GPGCX vs. SFCWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPGCX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SFCWX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPGCX vs. SFCWX - Dividend Comparison

GPGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.58%, more than SFCWX's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPGCX
Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund
14.58%15.65%7.19%1.92%2.98%5.88%1.70%0.27%0.00%0.00%
SFCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3
4.51%5.10%0.98%0.98%0.34%9.05%1.58%4.19%7.01%4.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPGCX and SFCWX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFCWX has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to GPGCX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPGCX dropped -37.17% vs SFCWX's -39.54%.

SFCWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPGCX and SFCWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer