GPGCX vs. SFCWX
GPGCX (Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund) and SFCWX (American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GPGCX returned 9.42%/yr vs 2.57%/yr for SFCWX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GPGCX charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SFCWX.
Performance
GPGCX vs. SFCWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPGCX achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than SFCWX's 12.98% return.
GPGCX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 19.60%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
SFCWX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 12.98%
- 6M
- 13.60%
- 1Y
- 26.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.35%
- 5Y*
- 2.57%
- 10Y*
- —
GPGCX vs. SFCWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPGCX Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund | 7.39% | 20.03% | 14.97% | 21.28% | -14.60% | 20.00% | 24.99% | 9.60% |
SFCWX American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3 | 12.98% | 14.49% | 2.72% | 19.34% | -29.65% | 10.54% | 37.95% | 8.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPGCX and SFCWX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2019 | 0.78 |
The correlation between GPGCX and SFCWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPGCX vs. SFCWX — Risk / Return Rank
GPGCX
SFCWX
GPGCX vs. SFCWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund (GPGCX) and American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3 (SFCWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPGCX | SFCWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.43 | 1.70 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.13 | 2.47 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.30 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 2.28 | -0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.23 | 9.12 | -3.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPGCX | SFCWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 1.70 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.14 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.51 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
GPGCX vs. SFCWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPGCX drawdown since its inception was -37.17%, smaller than the maximum SFCWX drawdown of -39.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPGCX and SFCWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPGCX | SFCWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.17% | -39.54% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.17% | -11.81% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.46% | -21.30% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.70% | -39.54% | +13.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -0.48% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -12.45% | +6.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 2.94% | +0.91% |
Volatility
GPGCX vs. SFCWX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund (GPGCX) is 4.15%, while American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3 (SFCWX) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that GPGCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFCWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPGCX | SFCWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 5.09% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.15% | 12.83% | -1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.08% | 15.82% | -1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 18.19% | -3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 18.51% | -2.33% |
GPGCX vs. SFCWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPGCX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SFCWX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
GPGCX vs. SFCWX - Dividend Comparison
GPGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.58%, more than SFCWX's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPGCX Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund | 14.58% | 15.65% | 7.19% | 1.92% | 2.98% | 5.88% | 1.70% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFCWX American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3 | 4.51% | 5.10% | 0.98% | 0.98% | 0.34% | 9.05% | 1.58% | 4.19% | 7.01% | 4.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPGCX and SFCWX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFCWX has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to GPGCX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPGCX dropped -37.17% vs SFCWX's -39.54%.
SFCWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPGCX and SFCWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer