PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPGCX vs. GQFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GPGCX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund (GPGCX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GPGCX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GPGCX
Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund
-4.50%20.03%14.97%21.28%-14.60%2.98%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
10.08%19.29%4.81%15.09%-1.13%5.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPGCX achieves a -4.50% return, which is significantly lower than GQFPX's 10.08% return.


GPGCX

1D
2.38%
1M
-9.19%
YTD
-4.50%
6M
-1.96%
1Y
16.21%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*

GQFPX

1D
0.37%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
10.08%
6M
11.45%
1Y
19.15%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GPGCX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPGCX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GPGCX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPGCX
GPGCX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GPGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GPGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

GQFPX
GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPGCX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund (GPGCX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPGCXGQFPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

1.58

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.51

2.03

-0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.33

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

1.96

-0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.10

9.35

-5.25

GPGCX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPGCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPGCX and GQFPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPGCXGQFPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

1.58

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.87

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between GPGCX and GQFPX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GPGCX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

GPGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.39%, more than GQFPX's 4.83% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
GPGCX
Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund
16.39%15.65%7.19%1.92%2.98%5.88%1.70%0.27%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
4.83%5.32%3.71%3.69%5.18%1.38%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GPGCX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPGCX drawdown since its inception was -37.17%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPGCX and GQFPX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GPGCXGQFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.17%

-16.95%

-20.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.17%

-9.37%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.92%

-2.80%

-8.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.36%

-3.03%

-3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

2.08%

+1.70%

Volatility

GPGCX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund (GPGCX) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 3.97%. This indicates that GPGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GPGCXGQFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.27%

3.97%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.36%

6.99%

+3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.85%

12.37%

+3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.17%

12.88%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

12.88%

+3.26%