GOU vs. PLTM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GOU (GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF) and PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - GOU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). GOU is actively managed, while PLTM is passively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GOU charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PLTM.

Performance

GOU vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF (GOU) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOU achieves a 29.22% return, which is significantly higher than PLTM's -7.60% return.

GOU

• 1D: 6.37%
• 1M: -10.21%
• YTD: 29.22%
• 6M: 24.76%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTM

• 1D: 1.90%
• 1M: -2.72%
• YTD: -7.60%
• 6M: 14.80%
• 1Y: 72.14%
• 3Y*: 21.98%
• 5Y*: 9.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOU vs. PLTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GOU GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF	29.22%	-2.90%
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	-7.60%	24.87%

Correlation

The correlation between GOU and PLTM is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025	0.24

Return for Risk

GOU vs. PLTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTM

PLTM Risk / Return Rank: 38
PLTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
PLTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
PLTM Omega Ratio Rank: 41
PLTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
PLTM Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOU vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF (GOU) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GOU	PLTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	0.24	+0.72

Drawdowns

GOU vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOU drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, smaller than the maximum PLTM drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOU and PLTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOU	PLTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.44%	-42.32%	+3.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.52%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.71%	-31.75%	+16.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.36%	-18.55%	+7.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.40%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GOU	PLTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	45.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.64%	51.42%	+8.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.64%	32.84%	+26.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.64%	30.98%	+28.66%

GOU vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOU has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

GOU vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison

Neither GOU nor PLTM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GOU and PLTM in my portfolio?

GOU and PLTM have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GOU or PLTM?

On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GOU or PLTM?

PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for GOU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GOU or PLTM?

GOU and PLTM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GOU and PLTM?

GOU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PLTM is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for GOU and 0.50% for PLTM.