GOPIX vs. STK

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn China A Share Equity Fund (GOPIX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK).

GOPIX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. STK is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Nov 25, 2009.

Performance

GOPIX vs. STK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn China A Share Equity Fund (GOPIX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GOPIX vs. STK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GOPIX abrdn China A Share Equity Fund	0.00%	25.89%	5.70%	-24.96%	-22.46%	-3.67%	56.93%	31.74%	-11.87%	35.06%
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund	4.31%	24.85%	17.74%	46.60%	-30.36%	48.63%	25.39%	52.73%	-14.91%	33.52%

Returns By Period

GOPIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

STK

• 1D: 5.54%
• 1M: -6.23%
• YTD: 4.31%
• 6M: 12.70%
• 1Y: 46.63%
• 3Y*: 22.64%
• 5Y*: 14.46%
• 10Y*: 19.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOPIX vs. STK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOPIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than STK's 1.26% expense ratio.

STK

Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund

GOPIX

abrdn China A Share Equity Fund

Return for Risk

GOPIX vs. STK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STK

STK Risk / Return Rank: 91
STK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
STK Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
STK Omega Ratio Rank: 86
STK Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
STK Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOPIX vs. STK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn China A Share Equity Fund (GOPIX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GOPIX	STK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.64	—

Correlation

The correlation between GOPIX and STK is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GOPIX vs. STK - Dividend Comparison

GOPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than STK's 7.16% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GOPIX abrdn China A Share Equity Fund	1.46%	1.46%	1.29%	0.79%	0.00%	5.22%	1.42%	4.45%	0.41%	1.24%	1.40%	2.03%
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund	7.16%	7.38%	16.02%	6.70%	12.62%	8.48%	6.79%	7.86%	14.88%	11.82%	9.87%	10.32%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GOPIX	STK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-41.74%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.59%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.27%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-7.51%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.47%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.67%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GOPIX	STK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.65%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.90%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	25.65%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	24.83%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	25.91%	—