GOPIX vs. MCSMX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn China A Share Equity Fund (GOPIX) and Matthews China Small Companies Fund (MCSMX).

GOPIX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. MCSMX is managed by Matthews. It was launched on May 30, 2011.

Performance

GOPIX vs. MCSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn China A Share Equity Fund (GOPIX) and Matthews China Small Companies Fund (MCSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GOPIX vs. MCSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GOPIX abrdn China A Share Equity Fund	0.00%	25.89%	5.70%	-24.96%	-22.46%	-3.67%	56.93%	31.74%	-11.87%	35.06%
MCSMX Matthews China Small Companies Fund	10.66%	28.85%	2.82%	-17.50%	-31.25%	6.71%	82.73%	35.41%	-17.65%	53.71%

Returns By Period

GOPIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MCSMX

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -10.72%
• YTD: 10.66%
• 6M: 6.47%
• 1Y: 31.98%
• 3Y*: 6.45%
• 5Y*: -2.56%
• 10Y*: 11.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOPIX vs. MCSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOPIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSMX's 1.41% expense ratio.

MCSMX

Matthews China Small Companies Fund

GOPIX

abrdn China A Share Equity Fund

Return for Risk

GOPIX vs. MCSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCSMX

MCSMX Risk / Return Rank: 67
MCSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
MCSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
MCSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
MCSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
MCSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOPIX vs. MCSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn China A Share Equity Fund (GOPIX) and Matthews China Small Companies Fund (MCSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GOPIX	MCSMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.34	—

Correlation

The correlation between GOPIX and MCSMX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GOPIX vs. MCSMX - Dividend Comparison

GOPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than MCSMX's 2.01% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GOPIX abrdn China A Share Equity Fund	1.46%	1.46%	1.29%	0.79%	0.00%	5.22%	1.42%	4.45%	0.41%	1.24%	1.40%	2.03%
MCSMX Matthews China Small Companies Fund	2.01%	2.23%	1.35%	2.36%	1.78%	26.38%	16.98%	1.03%	2.25%	5.66%	4.79%	8.88%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GOPIX	MCSMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-55.77%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.69%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-53.98%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-55.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-24.92%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-20.31%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GOPIX	MCSMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.13%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	22.12%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	24.01%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	21.99%	—